تأثیر کارآفرینی راهبردی بر عملکرد کسب‌وکار: نقش قابلیت‌های پویای سازمان و آشفتگی محیط کسب‌وکار در شرکت‌های دانش بنیان استان اصفهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی - کمی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت دانشگاه اصفهان

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشگاه اصفهان

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دانشگاه اصفهان

چکیده

این پژوهش به بررسی تأثیر کارآفرینی راهبردی بر عملکرد کسب‌وکار با توجه به قابلیت­های پویای سازمان و آشفتگی محیط کسب‌وکار در شرکت­های دانش‌بنیان استان اصفهان می­پردازد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و براساس ماهیت و روش توصیفی- همبستگی است. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش شرکت­های دانش بنیان استان اصفهان 230 شرکت بوده­اند. نمونۀ مورد بررسی با استفاده از جدول مورگان 143 شرکت دانش‌بنیان می‌باشد که به روش تصادفی دردسترس انتخاب شده‌اند. ابزار گردآوری داده­ها پرسش‌نامۀ محقق ساخته بوده که پایایی و روایی آن بررسی و تأیید شده و به هر شرکت یک پرسشنامه داده شده و توسط مدیر عامل آن تکمیل گردیده است. برای بررسی فرضیه­های پژوهش از روش معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس‌3 (Smart PLS 3) استفاده شد. نتایج به‌دست آمده از بررسی فرضیه­ها نشان می­دهد که آشفتگی محیطی و قابلیت­های پویای کسب‌وکار بر کارآفرینی راهبردی و هر سه متغیر بر عملکرد کسب‌وکار تأثیر­گذار است. همچنین، نقش میانجی­گری کارآفرینی راهبردی در تأثیرگذاری آشفتگی محیطی و قابلیت پویا بر عملکرد کسب‌وکار مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Strategic Entrepreneurship on Organizational Performance: Role of Dynamic Capabilities of the Organization and Turbulent Business Environment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Eghbal Majd 1
  • Ali Safari 2
  • Ali Shaemi Barzoki 3
1 Department of Management, Faculty of Administration Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administration Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administration Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

This research investigates the effect of strategic entrepreneurship on organizational performance considering the dynamic capabilities of the organization and the turbulent business environment in the knowledge-based companies of Isfahan province. The present research is applicable in terms of purpose and is correlative-survey from the nature view. The statistical population of the research is knowledge based companies in Isfahan province. Sample size, considering the availability and reliable information, 230 of them were considered as a statistical population and 143 reliable questionnaires were extracted and used for the research data. Random accessible sampling method was used for sampling.
In the studies of data collection on hypotheses and research model has been used by distributing questionnaires and field method. The data gathering tool is a researcher-made questionnaire. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire has been confirmed. Structural equations are used to investigate relationships. The software used is SPSS and Smart PLS. According to examining the hypothesis, the impact of environmental turbulent and dynamic business capabilities on strategic entrepreneurship and the effect of these variables on business performance were confirmed. The mediation roles of strategic entrepreneurship in the effect of environmental turbulent and dynamic business capabilities on business performance were confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Strategic Entrepreneurship
  • Environment Turbulence
  • Dynamic Business Capabilities
  • Business Performance
  • Isfahan

مراجع

صحت، سعید و محسن یاراحمدی .(1393). تبیین رابطة کارآفرینی شرکتی و عملکرد با میانجی سرمایة دانش بنیان، توسعۀ کارآفرینی ، (7)1: 172-153.
Allred, C. R., Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C. and Magnan, G. M. (2011). A dynamic collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 129–161.
Al-Matari, E.M., Al-Swidi, A.K. and Fadzil, F.H.B. (2014). The measurements of firm performance’s dimensions”, Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(1), 24-49.
Cai, L., Liu, Q., Deng, S. and Cao, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation and external technology acquisition: an empirical test on performance of technology-based new ventures. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15( 3), 544-561.
Camison, C., and Villar-Lopez, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902.
Chan, R.Y.K., He, H. W., Chan, H.K. and Wang, W.Y.C. (2012). Environmental orientation and corporate performance: the mediation mechanism of green supply chain management and moderating effect of competitive intensity, Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 621-630.
Chaston, I. and Scott, G.J. (2012).Entrepreneurship and open innovation in an emerging economy. Management Decision, 50(7), 1161-1177.
Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing, 75, 183–195.
Engelen, A., Gupta, V., Strenger, L. and Brettel, M. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm performance and the moderating role of transformational leadership behaviors, Journal of Management, 41(4), 1069-1097.
Gimenez, C., van der Vaart, T. and van Donk, D.P. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: the moderating effect of supply complexity, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(5), 583-610.
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L. (2007). Guest editor’s introduction to the special issue–strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation, Strategic Management Journal, 229(6/7), 479-491.
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Sirmon, D.G. and Trahms, C.A. (2011), Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations and society, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57-75.
Ireland, R.D. and Webb, J.W. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation, Business Horizons, 50(1), 49- 59.
Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A. and Simon, D.G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions, Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989.
Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Camp, S.M. and Sexton, D.L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth, Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49-63.
Kandemir, D. and Acur, N. (2012). Examining proactive strategic decision-making flexibility in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(4), 608-622.
Kandemir, D. and Yaprak, A.(2006). Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement and impact on market performance.Academy of Marketing ScienceJournal, 34(3), 324–340.
Kantur, D. (2016). Strategic entrepreneurship: mediating the entrepreneurial orientation performance link, Management Decision, 54(1), 24– 43.
Ketchen, D.J., Ireland, R.D. and Snow, C.C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3/4), 371-85.
Ko, S. and Tan, B.S. (2012). Knowledge transfer, perceived environmental turbulence and innovation in China, Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 104-116.
Kraus, S,. Kauranen, I,. and  Carl, H, R. .(2011). Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach. Management Research Review, 34(1), 58 – 74.
Kyrgidou , L. and Hughes,  P.M. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship: origins, core elements and research directions, European BusinessReview, 22(1), 43-63.
Lee, R.P. (2010). Extending the environment-strategy-performance framework: the roles of multinational corporation network strength, market responsiveness, and product innovation, Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 58-73.
Leischnig, A., Geigenmueller, A. and Lohmann, S. (2014). On the role of alliance management capability, organizational compatibility and interaction quality in inter organizational technology transfer. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1049–1057.
Lisboa, A., Skameas, D. and Lages, C. (2011). Innovative capabilities: Their drivers and effects on current and future performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1157–1161.
Luke, B., Kearins, K. and Verreynne, M.L. (2011). Developing a conceptual framework of strategic entrepreneurship, International Journal ofEntrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 17(3), 314-337.
Luqman, O., Oyewobi, A., Olukemi, W.J. and Olabode, B.R. (2015). Measuring strategic performance in construction companies: a proposed integrated model, Journal of Facilities Management, 13(2), 109– 132.
Margarietha, J,  and Villiers-Scheepers, D. (2012). Antecedents of strategic corporate entrepreneurship. European Business Review, 24(5), 400 – 424.
Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N. and Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 237–256.
Ottesen, G.G. and Grønhaug, K. (2004). Exploring the dynamics of market orientation in turbulent environments: a case study, European Journal of Marketing, 38(8), 956-973.
Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: a comparison of strategic orientations, Journal of Productand Innovation Management, 24, 534–553.
Pratono, A.H. (2016). Strategic orientation and information technological turbulence, Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), 368-382.
Sandeep, V. and Harpreet, S.B. (2016). Are subjective business performance measures justified? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(5), 603-621.
Simon, A; Bartle, C; Stockport, G; Smith,  B; Jane E. Klobas, E, J and Sohal, A.(2015).Business leaders’ views on the importance of strategic and dynamic capabilities for successful financial and non-financial business performance, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(7), 908-931.
Terziovski, M. (2007). Building Innovation Capability in Organizations: An International Cross-Case Perspective, London, Imperial College Press.
Thomas, E.F. (2014). Platform-based product design and environmental turbulence: the mediating role of strategic flexibility, EuropeanJournal ofInnovation Management, 17(1), 107-124.
Trkman,P.and McCormack,K.(2009).Supply chain risk in turbulent environments:a conceptual model for managing supply chain networkrisk, International Journal of Production Economics, 119, 247-258.
Urban, B. (2012). The effect of pro-entrepreneurship architecture on organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(3), 518-545.
Waal, A.D. and Kourtit, K. (2013).Performance measurement and management in practice: advantages, disadvantages and reasons for use. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62 (5), 446-473.
Wall, T.D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S.J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C.W. and West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance, Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95-118.
Wang, S. K. (2014). Impacts of environmental turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation and new product success, European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(2), 229–249.
Webb, J. W., Ketchen J. D. and Ireland R. D. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 56(1), 67-75.
Wei, L. and Ling, Y. (2015). CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1157-1165.
Winter, S.G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
Wu, D. (2009). Measuring performance in small and medium enterprises in the information and communication technology industries, Unpublished PhD thesis submitted to School of Management College of Business, RMIT University.
Zhou, K.,Yim, C.(2005).The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based break through innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42–60.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار