تبیین نقش اشتراک دانش بر دوسوتوانی سازمانی: نقش میانجی ظرفیت جذب شرکت (مورد مطالعه: شرکت‌های تولید دارو)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی - کمی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه خوارزمی

2 استادیار دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

چکیده

در حال حاضر، تعداد پژوهش‌ها دربارة دوسوتوانی رو به رشد است، اما درک مقدمات هر دو فعالیت تا حدودی روشن نیست. هدف این پژوهش تبیین تأثیر اشتراک دانش بر دوسوتوانی سازمانی (اکتشاف و بهره‌برداری) با توجه به نقش میانجی ظرفیت جذب شرکت است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش از نوع توصیفی– همبستگی، به‌طور مشخص مدل معادلات ساختاری است. جامعة آماری پژوهش شامل شرکت‌های تولید دارو در کشور می‌شود که با روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس 97 نفر از مدیران شرکت نمونه درنظر گرفته شدند. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامة استاندارد گردآوری شده‌اند. برای ارزیابی ابعاد مقیاس دوسوتوانی سازمانی از پتریدو وکایرگیدو (2011)، مقیاس اشتراک دانش فان دن هوف و ریدر (2004) و مقیاس ظرفیت جذب زهرا و جورج (2002) استفاده شده است. نرم‌افزار SmartPLS3 نیز برای تحلیل داده‌ها و بررسی مدل پژوهش به‌کار گرفته شده است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد اشتراک دانش و ظرفیت جذب شرکت تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر دوسوتوانی سازمانی دارد. به‌علاوه، ظرفیت جذب شرکت به‌عنوان متغیر میانجی رابطة اشتراک دانش و دوسوتوانی سازمانی عمل نمی‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effects of Knowledge Sharing on Organizational Ambidexterity: Explanation of Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity (Case: Pharmaceutical Companies)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yousef Vakili 1
  • Soltanali shahriari 2
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University.
چکیده [English]

Research on ambidexterity is burgeoning, yet understanding of the antecedents and consequences of both activities remains rather unclear. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of knowledge sharing on organizational ambidexterity (exploration and exploitation) as well as the mediating effect of mediating role of absorptive capacity. The research statistical population constitutes 97 pharmaceutical companies’ employer select available as the subjects. Data were collected via three standard questionnaires. In order to assess dimensions of organizational ambidexterity scale proposed by Kyrgidou & Petridou (2011), knowledge sharing scale was developed by Van den hoof & De ridder (2004), and absorptive capacity scale was developed by Zahra & George (2002), was employed. This study applies SmartPLS3 to investigate the research model. The results shows that knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity has positive effects on organizational ambidexterity. In addition, , this study reveals that absorptive capacity is not the mediating factor between knowledge sharing and organizational ambidexterity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • knowledge sharing
  • Absorptive Capacity
  • Organizational Ambidexterity
  • Exploration
  • Exploitation
 

داوری، علی و آرش رضازاده (1392)، مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار PLS، سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران.

Benner, M. J. & Tushman, M. L. (2003). “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited”, Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238- 256.

Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F. & Santoro, M. (2009). “The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation”, Journal of Management Studies, 46 (3).

Camiso´n, C. & Fore´s, B. (2011). “Knowledge creation and absorptive capacity: The effect of intra-district shared competences”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27, 66- 86.

Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128- 152.

Dougherty, D., Munir, K. & Subramaniam, M. (2002). “Managing technology flows in practice: A grounded theory of sustainable innovation”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Technology & Innovation Management Division, E1-E6.

Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, In Killman, R. H., Pondy, L. R. & Sleven, D. (Eds), The management of organization, 1: 167- 188. New York: North Holland.

Dysvik, A., Buch, R. & Kuvaas, B. (2015). “Knowledge donating and knowledge collecting”, Leadership & Org. Development Journal, 36(1): 35– 53.

Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A. & Brettel, M. (2011). “A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation”, European Management Journal, 29(2): 98–116.

Floyd, S. & Lane P. (2000). “Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing role Conflict in Strategic Renewal”, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 154- 177.

Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). “The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity”, Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 209- 226.

Hargadon, A. & Sutton, R. (1997). “Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716-749.

Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2005). “Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizational Antecedents Matter?”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 999- 1015.

Johannessen, J. & Olsen, B. (2003). “Knowledge management and sustainable competitive advantages: The impact of dynamic contextual training”, International Journal of Information Management, 23(4): 277– 289.

Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., García-Morales, V. J. & Molina, L. M. (2011). “Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity”, Technovation 31(5): 190- 202.

Kamaşak, R. & Bulutlar, F. (2010). “The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation”, European Business Review, 22(3): 306- 317.

Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Guilford Press, New York.

Kyrgidou, L. P. & Petridou, E. (2011). “The effect of competence exploration and competence exploitation on strategic entrepreneurship”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(6): 697- 713.

Lau, A. K. W. & Lo, W. (2015). “Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation, performance: An empirical study”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 92(2): 99– 114.

Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). “The Myopia of Learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 14(52): 95- 112.

Lubatkin, H., simsek, Z., Ling, Y. & Veiga, F. (2006). “Ambidexterity and Performance in SM Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration”, Journal of Management, 32(5): 646- 672.

March, J. G. (1991). “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, 2(1): 71– 87.

Mathias, B. D. (2014). Exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, and firm performance: A meta-analysis, In: exploration and exploitation in early stage ventures and SMEs, Published online, 13289-317.

Mathuramaytha, C. (2012). “Developing Knowledge-sharing Capabilities Influence Innovation Capabilities in Organizations a Theoretical Model”, International Conference on Education and Management Innovation IPEDR Vol. 30, IACSIT Press, Singapore.

McGrath, R. G. (2001). “Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight”, Academy of Management Journal,  44(1).­118-131

Naim, M. F. & Lenkla U. (2016). “Knowledge sharing as an intervention for Gen Y employees’ intention to stay”, Industrial and Commercial Training, 48(3): 142- 148.

O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2013). “Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, present, and Future”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 324–338.

Raisch, S. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). “Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators”, Journal of Management, 34(3): 375– 409.

Reagans, R. & McEvily, B. (2003). “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: Effects of Cohesion and Range”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 240- 267.

Riege, A. (2007). “Actions to Overcome Knowledge Transfer Barriers in MNCs”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1): 48- 67.

Schulze, P., Heinemann, F. & Abedin, A. (2008). “Balancing exploitation and exploration: Organizational antecedents and performance effects of ambidexterity”, Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management.

Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J. & Clark, K. D. (2005). “Existing knowledge, Knowledge Creation, Capability, and the rate of new Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 346- 357.

Storey, C. & Kelly, D. (2002). “Innovation in services: The Need for knowledge Management”, Australasian Marketing Journal, 10(1): 59- 70.

Subramaniam, M. & Youndt, M. A. (2005). “The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 450- 463.

Taleb, A. T., Singh, H. S., Farouk, S. & Sohal, A. S. (2016). “Knowledge Sharing Enablers, Processes and firm Innovation Capability”, Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(8).

Tsai, W. (2001). “Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business innovation and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996- 1004.

Turner, N., Maylor, H. & Swart, J. (2015). “Ambidexterity in projects: A intellectual capital perspective”, International Journal of Project Management, 33(1): 177- 188.

Tushman, M. & O’Reilly, C. (1996). “Evolution and Revolution: Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation and Change”, California Mang. Review, 38(4): 8- 30.

Van den Hoof, B. & De ridder, J. A. (2004). “Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(8).

Wang, S. & Noe, R. A. (2010). “Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research”, Human Resource Mang. Review, 20(2): 115- 131.

Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension”, Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185- 203.