نظریه رشد پنرُزی: مروری سیستماتیک بر ادبیات

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی- کیفی

نویسندگان

1 گروه کارآفرینی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران.

2 گروه کسب و کار، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف:  هدف این مقاله، بررسی نظریۀ پنرُز در 60 سال گذشته با روش مرور سیستماتیک ادبیات است.
روش تحقیق: در این پژوهش، رویکرد علم سنجی با استفاده از تحلیل همواژگانی با روش توصیفی و کاربردی انتخاب شده است. از سایت گوگل اسکالر بین سال 1994 تا 2021، مقالات مروری مرتبط با موضوع و سؤال پژوهش جمع‌آوری شده و لیست کلمات کلیدی پُررویداد در این مقالات با استفاده از نرم‌افزار وُس ویور به دست آمده است. سپس با تحلیل محتوای متنی، ایده‌‌های کلیدی مستتر در نظریه رشد پنرُز شناسایی شده‌اند.
یافته ها: در این پژوهش، ایده‌های کلیدی مستتر در نظریه رشد پنرُز شناسایی شده‌اند که شامل تصویرسازی ذهنی کارآفرینان، قابلیت‌های پویا، منابع بلااستفاده و مازاد، تیم مدیریتی، فرصت‌های مولد و نوآوری هستند. پژوهش‌های آتی می‌توانند در راستای خلاءهای دانشی، به مطالعۀ ارتباط میان مدل‌‌های کسب وکار و مراحل ‌رشد شرکت‌‌ها بپردازند و شرایط زمینه‌ای اثرگذار بر انتخاب مدل‌‌های مناسب با ‌رشد شرکت‌‌های کارآفرینانه را شناسایی نمایند.
نتیجه گیری: این مقاله نتیجه می‌گیرد که نظریه‌ها به عنوان بهترین ابزار دانش در نظر گرفته می‌شوند. توجه به کلید واژه‌‌ها و دیدگاه‌های ذهنی مطرح شده، می‌تواند ازجمله موضوعات پژوهشی مناسب در قلمرو موضوعی رشد کسب وکار‌های کارآفرینانه باشد. پژوهش‌های آتی می‌توانند به مطالعۀ ارتباط میان مدل‌‌های کسب وکار و مراحل ‌رشد شرکت‌‌ها بپردازند و شرایط زمینه‌ای اثرگذار بر انتخاب مدل‌‌های مناسب با ‌رشد شرکت‌‌های کارآفرینانه را شناسایی کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Penrose’s growth theory: a systematic review of the literature

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rasoul Noormohammadi Najafabadi 1
  • Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi 2
1 Department of Entrepreneurship, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 New Business Department, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: The objective of this article is to systematically review the literature in the last 60 years to investigate Penrose's theory.
Methods: The research methodology involves a descriptive and practical approach with a scientometric technique using co-word analysis. Review articles related to the topic and research question were extracted from the Google Scholar site between 1994 and 2021, and the list of frequently occurring keywords in these articles was obtained using the visualization software VOSviewer. The key ideas hidden in Penrose's growth theory were obtained by analyzing the textual content.
Findings: The key ideas hidden in Penrose's growth theory were identified, including mental imagery of entrepreneurs, dynamic capabilities, unused and surplus resources, management team, productive opportunities, and innovation. The article proposes future research to study the relationship between business models and growth stages of companies and identify the background conditions affecting the selection of suitable models for entrepreneurial company growth.
Conclusion: The article concludes that theories are the best tools of knowledge. Paying attention to the keywords and subjective views raised can be among the appropriate research topics in the subject area of entrepreneurial business growth. The study emphasizes the importance of theories and highlights the potential for future research to address knowledge gaps in the field.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Co-word
  • Entrepreneur
  • Growth theory
  • Penrose
  • Systematic review

مراجع

Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., & Howitt, P. (2015). The Schumpeterian growth paradigm. Economics, 7(1), 557-575. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-21
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management international review, 47(2), 175-192. doi: 10.1007/s11575-007-0009-1
Baron RA & Ensley M. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science. 52(9), 1331–-1344. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0572
Bosma, N., Hill, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Kelley, D., Levie, J., & Tarnawa, A. (2020). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2019/2020 Global Report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, London Business School.
Chen, W. H., Kang, M. P., & Butler, B. (2018). How does top management team composition matter for continual growth? Reinvestigating Penrose’s growth theory through the lens of upper echelons theory. Management Decision, 56(4), 853-869. doi: 10.1108/MD-02-2017-0147
Chen, X., Zou, H., & Wang, D. T. (2009). How do new ventures grow? Firm capabilities, growth strategies and performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.06.001
‏‏‏ Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30-50.
Coad, A., & Guenther, C. (2014). Processes of firm growth and diversification: theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 857-871. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9569-5
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic management journal, 23(12), 1095-1121. doi: 10.1002/smj.274
Davidson, P. (2016). This Thing Called “Theory”. In Researching Entrepreneurship (pp. 41-73). Springer, Cham.
Davidson, P., & Wiklund, J. (Eds.). (2013). New perspectives on firm growth. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Davidson, P., Achtenhagen, L., & Naldi, L. (2010). Small firm growth. Now Publishers Inc.
Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189-216. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-8
Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 227-246.
Eshima, Y., & Anderson, B. S. (2017). Firm growth, adaptive capability, and entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic management journal, 38(3), 770-779. doi: 10.1002/smj.2516
Farjoun, M. (1994). Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise, diversification and resource-related industry groups. Organization science, 5(2), 185-199.
Feng, H., Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2017). Firm capabilities and growth: the moderating role of market conditions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 76-92. doi: 10.1007/s11747-016-0482-2
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage publications.
Foss, N. J. (1998). The resource-based perspective: an assessment and diagnosis of problems. Scandinavian Journal of management, 14(3), 133-149.
Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource‐based view: toward a new synthesis. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 2(1), 73-94.
Garnsey, E. (1998). A theory of the early growth of the firm. Industrial and corporate change, 7(3), 523-556.
Garnsey, E., Stam, E., & Heffernan, P. (2006). New firm growth: Exploring processes and paths. Industry and Innovation, 13(1), 1-20.
Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management review, 10(4), 696-706.
Gavinelli, L. (2016). Business Strategies and Competitiveness in Times of Crisis. A Survey on Italian SMEs. Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gruber M, MacMillan IC and Thompson JD. (2013). Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups? Organization Science, 24(1), 280–300.
Hindle, K., & Klyver, K. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of research on new venture creation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Joseph, J., & Wilson, A. J. (2018). The growth of the firm: An attention‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1779-1800. doi: 10.1002/smj.2882
Kim, J., Lee, C. Y., & Cho, Y. (2016). Technological diversification, core-technology competence, and firm growth. Research Policy, 45(1), 113-124.
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Information and software technology, 52(8), 792-805.
Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 104, 380-392.
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2000). Penrose’s resource‐based approach: the process and product of research creativity. Journal of management studies, 37(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00174
Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of management studies, 44(7), 1187-1212.‏1212. ‏
Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., Siemsen, E., & Tan, D. (2016). Penrose's The Theory of the Growth of the Firm: An exemplar of engaged scholarship. Production and Operations Management, 25(10), 1727-1744.
Kyläheiko, K., Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Tuppura, A. (2011). Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and appropriability. International business review, 20(5), 508-520.
Lee, C. Y. (2010). A theory of firm growth: Learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth. Research Policy, 39(2), 278-289.
Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. (2011). Organic and acquisitive growth: Re‐examining, testing and extending Penrose's growth theory. Journal of management studies, 48(1), 48-74.
Lukes, M., & Laguna, M. (Eds.). (2010). Entrepreneurship: A psychological approach. Oeconomicaeconomic.
Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 26-40.
Mahmood, T., & Mubarik, M. S. (2020). Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120248.
Mawdsley, J., & Somaya, D. (2020). Business Growth in Knowledge-Based Services: Relational Embeddedness and the Breadth of Added Value Opportunities. HEC Paris Research Paper No. SPE-2019-1340.
Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. (2004). Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic management journal, 25(12), 1179-1197.
Mohammadi, G., Sajadi, S. M., & Sakhdari, K. (2019). Entrepreneurial Decision-Making Model: A Meta-Synthesis Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(3), 87-108.
 doi: 10.52547/jimp.9.3.87 (In Persian)
Moradi, Mohammad Ali (2015), Business Environment: Theories, Indices, Techniques, 2nd Edition, Tehran, University of Tehran Press (In Persian)
Naldi, L., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Entrepreneurial growth: The role of international knowledge acquisition as moderated by firm age. Journal of business venturing, 29(5), 687-703.
Nason, R. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of management, 44(1), 32-60.
Nayeri, S., Hejazi, S. R., & Sakhdari, K. (2021). Openness in Process Innovation: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(1), 158-139.
 doi: 10.22059/jed.2020.307293.653427 (In Persian)
Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 297-316.
Orser, B. J., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Riding, A. L. (2000). Performance, fi rm size and management problem solving. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(4), 42–58.
Peng, M. W. (2001). The resource-based view and international business. Journal of management, 27(6), 803-829.
Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
Penrose, E. (1960), The Growth of the Firm—A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company,'Business History Review, X X X I V, 1-23.
Penrose, E., & Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.
Piao, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). How exploitation impedes and impels exploration: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1431-1447.
Pisoni, A., & Onetti, A. (2018). When startups exit: comparing strategies in Europe and the USA. Journal of Business Strategy.
Pitelis, C. N., & Wagner, J. D. (2019). Strategic shared leadership and organizational dynamic capabilities. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 233-242.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26(1), 22-40.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource‐based view of strategic management. Strategic management journal, 23(8), 769-780.
Sengoku, S. (2019). Consortium-based open innovation: Exploring a unique and optimal model for regional biotechnology industry. In Innovation beyond technology (pp. 141-171). Springer, Singapore.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of management review, 32(1), 273-292.
Teece, D. (2006, May). Explicating dynamic capabilities. In Seminar held at the Judge Business School, Cambridge May.
Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Vaz, R. (2021). Firm growth: A review of the empirical literature. Revista galega de economía: Publicación Interdisciplinar da Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais, 30(2), 74-93.
Wennberg, K., & DeTienne, D. R. (2014). What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 4-16.
Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small business economics, 32(4), 351-374.
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار