تحلیل مضمون ساز و کار محور ادبیات وجه مخرب کارآفرینی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی- کیفی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه کارآفرینی سازمانی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه کسب وکار، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد کارآفرینی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

جریان تحقیقی بدی های کارآفرینی علی رغم عمر قریب به 40 ساله اش،هنوز با نواقص و تهی گاه های بی شماری مواجه است.با این حال طی سالهای اخیر،روند اتفاقات مخرب در دنیای واقعی کارآفرینی سبب گردیده تا توجهات بیش از هر زمان دیگری به آنچه دهه ها قبل "وجه تاریک کارآفرینی" نامیده شد جلب شده و در همین زمان اندک پژوهش های قابل توجهی در راستای کشف ابعاد مختلف این پدیده ی نامیمون انجام گیرد.با این حال،بذل توجه اندک به روش های تحقیق کیفی و مشخصا روش های کیفی نظام مند،باعث شده تا مفاهیم طرح شده در این ادبیات،در وهله ی نخست،پراکنده و ناکارآمد و بعد از بعد نظری توسعه نیافته و مجرد بمانند.لذا انجام پژوهشی از جنس تحلیل مضمون،امکان معنادارسازی یافته های پیشین محققین و ارائه ی تصویری جامع از چیستی پدیده را فراهم می آورد.مضاف بر اینکه پیگیری این روش با در نظر داشتن چارچوب ترکیب ساز و کار محور سبب میشد تا یافته های پژوهش نه تنها برای نظریه پردازان که برای عمل گرایان حوزه ی کارآفرینی نیز قابل بهره برداری و اثرسازی باشد.در پژوهش حاضر،برای نخستین بار،8 قلمرو مضمونی، 34 گروه مضمونی و 189 کد سطح اول حول موضوع "وجه مخرب کارآفرینی" شناسایی و تشکیل گردید.نهایتا توصیه هایی از ابعاد نظری و کاربردی خطاب به پژوهشگران آتی و سیاستگذاران حوزه کارآفرینی ارائه گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Destructive entrepreneurship; a mechanism-based thematic analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Padash 1
  • Jahangir Yadollahi 2
  • Farhad Feizi 3
1 Associate prof., Department of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate, professor, Department of Business Creation Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran.
3 Masters student of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Despite its nearly 40 years,, the research stream on the bad of entrepreneurship still faces numerous shortcomings and gaps. However, in recent years, the trend of destructive events in the real world of entrepreneurship has led to more attention than ever before. What was called the "dark side of entrepreneurship" decades ago has attracted some significant research to explore the various dimensions of this unbelievable phenomenon. However, little attention has been paid to qualitative research methods and specifically methods. Systematic qualitative methods has caused the concepts proposed in this literature to be scattered ,inefficient,, undeveloped and abstract on the viewpoint the theoretical dimension. Then, conducting research on the basis of thematic analysis provides the possibility of significance of the previous findings of researchers, providing a comprehensive picture of what the phenomenon is. Furthermore,, following this method by considering the mechanism-based composition framework would cause the research findings. In this study, for the first time, 8 thematic domains, 34 thematic groups and 189 first level codes were identified and formed around the topic of "destructive aspect of entrepreneurship". Finally, recommendations of theoretical and practical dimensions were provided to future researchers and policy makers of entrepreneurship.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurship
  • Destructive side
  • Dark Side
  • Negative side
  • Content Analysis

منابع

شریف زاده محمدشریف، عبدالله زاده غلامحسین و عربیون ابوالقاسم. (1393). آسیب‌شناسی اخلاقی کارآفرینی و توسعة کسب‌وکار: رویکردی پدیدارشناسانه.  توسعه کارآفرینی7(4), 589-611.
Alonso, A. D., Kok, S. K., O'Brien, S., & Geneste, L. (2020). Understanding entrepreneurial deviance through social learning and entrepreneurial action theory: an empirical study. European Business Review. 32 (4):643-666.
Bayraktar, S. (2016). Do entrepreneurs really create entrepreneurial cultures? When intentions do not match actions. Bogazici Journal.30 (2), 79-98
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology3(2), 77-101.
Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human resource management review21(4), 268-284.
Cardon, M. S., Stevens, C. E., & Potter, D. R. (2011). Misfortunes or mistakes?: Cultural sense making of entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing26(1), 79-92.
Contreras, F. K., Oliveira, F. B. D., & Martins, E. S. (2012). Internet: monitored freedom. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 9(3), 459- 472.
DeNisi, A. S. (2015). Some further thoughts on the entrepreneurial personality. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Volume: 39 issue: 5, page(s): 997-1003
De Vries, M. K. (1977). The entrepreneurial personality: A person at the crossroads. Journal of management studies14(1), 34-57.
De Vries, M. F. (1985). The dark side of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review (November–December), 160–167
Eklund, J., Levratto, N., & Ramello, G. B. (2020). Entrepreneurship and failure: two sides of the same coin?. Small Business Economics54(2), 373-382.
El Harbi, S., Grolleau, G., Sutan, A., & Ben Ticha, Z. (2020). Are individuals with entrepreneurial characteristics more likely to engage in destruction? An experimental investigation among potential 21st century entrepreneurs in Tunisia. Bulletin of Economic Research, 72(1), 33-49
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics5(1), 1-4.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods16(1), 15-31.
Grijalva, E., & Harms, P. D. (2014). Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementarity model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 108-127
Gudmundsson, S. V., & Lechner, C. (2013). Cognitive biases, organization, and entrepreneurial firm survival. European Management Journal, 31(3), 278-294
Haynes, K. T., Hitt, M. A., & Campbell, J. T. (2015). The dark side of leadership: Towards a mid‐range theory of hubris and greed in entrepreneurial contexts. Journal of management studies, 52(4), 479-505.
Haynes, K. T., Josefy, M., & Hitt, M. A. (2015). Tipping point: Managers’ self-interest, greed, and altruism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 265-279.
Hayward, M. L., Shepherd, D. A., & Griffin, D. (2006). A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management science, 52(2), 160-172.
Hmieleski, K. M., Corbett, A. C., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurs’ improvisational behavior and firm performance: A study of dispositional and environmental moderators. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), 138-150
Hmieleski, K. M., & Lerner, D. A. (2016). The dark triad and nascent entrepreneurship: An examination of unproductive versus productive entrepreneurial motives. Journal of Small Business Management54, 7-32.
Jiang, H., Cannella, A. A., & Jiao, J. (2018). Does desperation breed deceiver? A behavioral model of new venture opportunism. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(5), 769-796
Jiang, H., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Li, G. (2020). Golden Apples or Green Apples? The Effect of Entrepreneurial Creativity on Green Entrepreneurship: A Dual Pathway Model. Sustainability, 12(15), 62-85.
Karmann, T., Mauer, R., Flatten, T. C., & Brettel, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 223-234
Kibler, E., Wincent, J., Kautonen, T., Cacciotti, G., & Obschonka, M. (2019). Can prosocial motivation harm entrepreneurs' subjective well-being?. Journal of business venturing34(4), 608-624.
Lehner, O. M., & Kansikas, J. (2012). Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship: A thematic meta-analysis. The Journal of Entrepreneurship21(1), 25-58.
Lundmark, E., & Westelius, A. (2019). Antisocial entrepreneurship: Conceptual foundations and a research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing Insights11, e00104.
Mantere, S., Aula, P., Schildt, H., & Vaara, E. (2013). Narrative attributions of entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing28(4), 459-473.
Meglich. P. A., Eesley. D. T. (2011), A “Bully” in its Own China Shop: Risk Factors for Abusive Supervision in Small Firms. International Journal of Business and Social Science,2(19):11- 22
Miller, D. (2015). A downside to the entrepreneurial personality? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,39 (1): 1-8
Parker. S. C. (2012). The costs of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 4(4):330-350.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality36(6), 556-563.
Qin, X., Shepherd, D. A., Lin, D., Xie, S., Liang, X., & Lin, S. (2020). The Dark Side of Entrepreneurs’ Creativity: Investigating How and When Entrepreneurs’ Creativity Increases the Favorability of Potential Opportunities That Harm Nature. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
Shepherd, D. A. (2019). Researching the dark side, downside, and destructive side of entrepreneurship: It is the compassionate thing to do!. Academy of Management Discoveries5(3), 217-220.
Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management43(1), 59-86.
Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Baron, R. A. (2013). “I care about nature, but…”: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm. Academy of Management Journal56(5), 1251-1273.
Shepherd, D. A., Wiklund, J., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure. Journal of business venturing24(2), 134-148.
Shepherd, D., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Birds of a feather don't always flock together: Identity management in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing24(4), 316-337.
Smith, R., & McElwee, G. (2011). After the fall: Developing a conceptual script-based model of shame in narratives of entrepreneurs in crisis!. International journal of sociology and social policy. 31(1/2):91-109.
Sober, E. (1989). Evolutionary altruism and psychological egoism. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 126:495-514.
Spivack, A. J., & McKelvie, A. (2021). Measuring addiction to entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights15, e00212.
Van Burg, E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2014). Creating the future together: Toward a framework for research synthesis in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(2), 369-397.
Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2013). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1041-1069.
Wright, K., Golder, S., & Rodriguez-Lopez, R. (2014). Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions. BMC medical research methodology, 14(1), 1-8.
Wright, M., & Zahra, S. (2011). The other side of paradise: Examining the dark side of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal1(3), 1-7.
Yu, J. X., Qin, L., & Chang, L. (2009). Keyword search in databases. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management1(1), 1-155.
Yu, M. C., Wang, G. G., Zheng, X. T., & Shi, W. J. (2020). Entrepreneur narcissism and unethical pro-organizational behavior: an examination of mediated-moderation model. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 501-520.