بررسی تاثیر دو سوتوانی سازمانی بر کارآفرینی راهبردی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی - کمی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت صنعتی دانشگاه تهران

2 استادیار گروه کارآفرینی دانشگاه خوارزمی

3 دانشیار دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر دوسوتوانی سازمانی بر کارآفرینی راهبردی در شرکت‌های تولیدکنندة نرم‌افزار است. به‌این‌منظور، دوسوتوانی با دو بعد اکتشاف و بهره‌برداری به‌عنوان متغیر مستقل و کارآفرینی راهبردی با چهار بعد ذهنیت کارآفرینانه، نوآوری، ادارة راهبردی منابع و مزیت رقابتی به‌عنوان متغیر وابسته بررسی شد. این تحقیق از نظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر نحوة گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی- همبستگی و به‌طور مشخص مبتنی‌بر مدل معادلات ساختاری است. ابزار اندازه‌گیری پرسشنامه‌ای با 22 پرسش بود که 97 شرکت به آن پاسخ دادند و برای بررسی روایی آن از روایی همگرا و واگرا و برای پایایی آن از آلفای کرونباخ و پایایی ترکیبی استفاده شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SmartPLS3 انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد دوسوتوانی بر کارآفرینی راهبردی اثر مثبت و معناداری دارد؛ بنابراین، تمرکز بر ارتقای دوسوتوانی به توسعه و ارتقای کارآفرینی راهبردی در سازمان منجر می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity on Strategic Entrepreneurship

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of organizational ambidexterity on strategic entrepreneurship in software companies. Therefore we examined the ambidexterity with two dimensions i.e. exploration and exploitation as an independent variable and strategic entrepreneurship with four dimensions i.e. entrepreneurial mindset, innovation, managing resources strategically and competitive advantage as the dependent variable. The research methodology is based on structural equation modeling. We use a questionnaire with 22 questions that 97 firms answered it. To measure the validity and reliability we used convergent and divergent validity and Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability respectively. Data analysis has performed by using SmartPLS3. The results show that ambidexterity has a positive and significant effect on strategic entrepreneurship. So we can conclude focus on improving ambidexterity can lead to development and promotion of strategic entrepreneurship.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational Ambidexterity
  • Strategic Entrepreneurship
  • Exploration
  • Exploitation
  • Competitive Advantage
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., and Zhang, H. (2009) Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science20(4): 781–796.

Chang, Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal30(1), 1-17.

Chang, Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011),"Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes", Management Decision, Vol. 49 Iss 10 pp. 1658 – 1676.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Mang. J., 47: 209-226.

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 4: 693-706

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Org. science,15(4), 481-494.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Sirmon, D. G., & Trahms, C. A. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations, and society. The Academy of Management Perspectives25(2), 57-75.

Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M., & Sexton, D.L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 479-491.

Im, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science54(7), 1281-1296.

Ireland, R., Webb, J. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49-59.

Ireland, R.D., & Webb, J.W. (2009). Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship: Transitioning between exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 52(5), 469-479.

Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., & Sirmon, D.G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. J. Management, 29(6), 963-989.

Kang S., and Snell S.A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies46(1): 65–92.

Ketchen Jr, D.J., Ireland, R.D., & Snow, C.C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strg. Ent. Journal, 1(3-4), 371-385.

Kitapçi, H.,& Çelı̇k, V. (2014). The Relationship between Ambidexterity, Organizational Learning Capacity and Firm Quality Performance, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 109, 827–836.

Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2013). Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal7(1), 70-91.‌

Kline, R. (2010).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.Guilford Press. New York.

Kraus, S., Kauranen, I., & Reschke, C. (2011). Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach. Management Research Review34(1), 58-74.

Kyrgidou, L. P., & Petridou, E. (2011). The effect of competence exploration and competence exploitation on strategic entrepreneurship. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management23(6), 697-713.

Kyrgidou, L.P., and Hughes, M. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship: origins, core elements and research directions. European Business Review, 22(1), 43-63.

Lisboa, A., Skarmeas, D.,& Lages, C. (2013),"Export market exploitation and exploration and performance", Int. Marketing Review, Vol. 30(3) pp. 211 – 230.

Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to mediumsized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5):646-672.

March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2:71-87.

Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2008). The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity–firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Industrial Marketing Management37(4), 455-470.

O’Reilly, A. & Tushman, L., (2008), Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Res. in Org. Behavior, 28, 185-206.

Raisch, S.,& Birkinshaw, J. (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators.J. of Management34(3): 375–409.

Razavi, S. M., Ahmadpour, M. & Shahriari S.(1393). A New Conceptual Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Development, 7(1), 37-55. (in Persian).

Schindehutte, M. & Morris, M.H. (2009).Advancing strategic entrepreneurship research: the role of complexity science in shifting the paradigm, Entrepreneurship: Theory &Practice, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 241-76.

Stadler, C., Rajwani, T., & Karaba, F. (2014). Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: networks as a new level of analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 172-193.‌

Turner, N., and Lee-Kelley,L. (2012). Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics, Management Learning 44(2), 179 –196.

Webb, J. W., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of entrepreneurship and strategy in the informal economy. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal8(1), 1-15.‌

Webb, J.W., Ketchen, D.J., & Ireland, R.D. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 67-77.

Y-H. Li, and Huang, J.W. (2012). Ambidexterity's mediating impact on product development proficiency and new product performance, Industrial Marketing Management 41: 1125–1132.

Yiu, D. W., Hoskisson, R. E., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. (2014). Dueling institutional logics and the effect on strategic entrepreneurship in Chinese business groups. Strategic Entrepreneurship  Journal8(3), 195-213.