Journal of  Entrepreneurship Development

Journal of Entrepreneurship Development

Identifying Corporate Governance Components Related to Entrepreneurial Performance in the Iranian Steel Industry

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Organizational Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.22059/jed.2026.416693.654701
Abstract
**Abstract**





**Objective:** Corporate governance and corporate entrepreneurship are among the most important factors contributing to competitiveness enhancement and value creation in business organizations. Despite the growing body of research in these areas, there remains limited understanding of how different corporate governance components are related to entrepreneurial performance in strategic industries in developing countries, particularly within the economic and institutional context of Iran. This study aimed to identify the corporate governance components associated with entrepreneurial performance in Iran’s steel industry and to explain their role in fostering corporate entrepreneurial activities.





**Method:** This qualitative study was conducted based on an interpretive paradigm. The study population comprised companies operating in Iran’s steel industry. Given the nature and objective of the research, which was to gain an in-depth understanding of the corporate governance components associated with entrepreneurial performance, 13 steel companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange were selected as the cases through purposive sampling. The selection was based on criteria including relevance to the research topic, the presence of formal corporate governance structures, and accessibility to information and qualified participants. The participants consisted of 16 managers and experts associated with the selected companies who were chosen based on their managerial experience, specialized knowledge, and familiarity with management, corporate governance, and innovation. Sampling and interviewing continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Charmaz’s three-stage coding approach, including initial, focused, and axial coding. MAXQDA software was also employed to enhance the accuracy, coherence, and traceability of the data analysis process.





**Results:** The findings indicated that a set of corporate governance components can be associated with the entrepreneurial performance of steel companies through different pathways. Seven major components were identified: transparency and accountability; regulatory and institutional environment; corporate communication network; ownership structure and institutional arrangements; board structure and responsibilities; protection of minority shareholders’ rights; and organizational culture and risk-taking. The findings showed that enhancing information transparency and managerial accountability can reduce information ambiguity and improve oversight and strategic decision-making, thereby creating more favorable conditions for identifying and exploiting innovative opportunities. Moreover, effective monitoring mechanisms, active board participation in strategic decision-making, and appropriate ownership structures and institutional arrangements can facilitate coordination and resource allocation for entrepreneurial activities. Furthermore, an organizational culture supportive of innovation and risk-taking, together with stronger interactions with stakeholders and external institutions, facilitates access to resources, knowledge, and new opportunities and enhances firms’ capacity for innovation and value creation.





**Conclusion:** The findings demonstrate that corporate governance is not merely a control and monitoring mechanism; rather, it can function as a strategic capacity for fostering corporate entrepreneurship and enhancing entrepreneurial performance. Accordingly, simultaneous attention to monitoring and control mechanisms, ownership structure, the role of the board of directors, shareholder rights, the institutional environment, communication networks, and organizational culture can create more favorable conditions for developing innovative and entrepreneurial activities in steel companies. By identifying these components within the context of Iran’s steel industry, this study contributes to the theoretical literature at the intersection of corporate governance and corporate entrepreneurship and provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that influence innovation, opportunity exploitation, and value creation in industrial firms.





**Keywords:** Corporate governance, entrepreneurial performance, steel industry, organizational culture, ownership structure.
Keywords
Subjects

Bagh, T., Hunjra, A. I., & Corbet, S. (2025). The impact of corporate governance on firm value: Understanding the role of strategic change. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103, 104472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104472
Beigi, V., Abouei Ardakan, M., Moghimi, S. M., & Nobakht, M. B. (2023). Designing a governance model for state-owned enterprises within the framework of general economic policies. Modiriyat-e Dowlaty [Public Administration], 15 (1), 12–40. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2021.311674.2833
Brown, J. R., & Martinsson, G. (2018). Does transparency stifle or facilitate innovation? Management Science, 65 (4), 1600–1623. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.3002
Búrigo, R. G., Amboni, N., Bastos, P. S. de M., & Lengler, F. R. (2022). Corporate governance and entrepreneurial orientation in Brazilian companies: Validation of a measurement scale. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 24 (62), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2022.e83983
Bushman, Robert M. & Smith, Abbie J., 2001. "Financial accounting information and corporate governance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32 (1-3), pages 237-333, December. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101 (01)00027-1
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27 (1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700102
Estévez-Mendoza, C., & Montoro-Sánchez, Á. (2024). Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, 123784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123784
Faghih, N., Bonyadi, E. & Sarreshtehdari, L. Assessing the entrepreneurship process: an application of the data envelopment analysis. J Glob Entrepr Res 11, 311–327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-021-00289-8
Fahimnejad, Z., Gholamzadeh Ledari, M., Nikoomaram, H., & Talebnia, G. (2025). Analyzing the effectiveness of the corporate governance system in Iran based on the grounded theory approach. Journal of Technology in Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management, 4 (2), 1–22. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jtesm.4.2.6
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Farag, H., Mallin, C., & Ow-Yong, K. (2014). Governance, ownership structure, and performance of entrepreneurial IPOs in AIM companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22 (2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12049
Ghaemi, M. H., & Shahriari, M. (2019). Corporate governance and firms’ financial performance. Shiraz University Advances in Accounting Journal, 1 (1), 57–73. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22099/jaa.2009.3445
Ghorbani, A., & Blankesteijn, M. L. (2025). Governance arrangements for academic entrepreneurship: Structures, processes, and mechanisms. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00562-0
Grandori, A. (2024). Entrepreneurial governance and the nature of the entrepreneurial firm. Small Business Economics, 63, 1503–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00883-6
Hapt, N. (2011). Corporate governance principles: A practitioner’s guide.
Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford University Press.
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5 (1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1099-0836 (199603)5:1%3C30::AID-BSE38%3E3.0.CO;2-Q
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate governance, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101 (01)00018-0 
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM, 42 (4), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/299157.299175
Jalalki, P., Ghiyour, F., & Bagheri, K. (2018). Examining the relationship between voluntary disclosure of corporate governance and financial performance in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Experimental Accounting Research, 8 (29), 39–60. [In Persian]. 10.22051/jera.2018.11873.1447
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X (76)90026-X
Keil, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (8), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.672 
Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2003). Corporate entrepreneurship: The dynamic strategy for 21st century organizations. In D. F. Kuratko & M. H. Morris (Eds.), Corporate entrepreneurship (pp. 1–30). Harcourt/Thomson. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-4736 (02)14002-1
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X (00)00065-9
Love, I. (2011). Corporate governance and performance around the world: What we know and what we don’t. The World Bank Research Observer, 26 (1), 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp030
Ma, Y., & Shleifer, A. (2025). The invention of corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 172, 104115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2025.104115
Molokwu, V. B., Barreria, J., & Urban, B. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and corporate governance structures at the firm level in the South African oil and gas industry. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (1), a443. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.443
Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2007). Can Directors Impact Performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Australian Journal of Management, 32 (1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
Rajabi Sarkhoni, M., Bavaghar, M., Ranjbar, M. H., & Moradpour, S. (2025). The impact of firm size and ownership structure on innovation capability in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Dynamic Management and Business Analysis, 4 (1), 262–279. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.61838/dmbaj.186  
Razdar, M. R., & Zare, A. (2025). The effect of sustainability reporting in firms with strong governance on stock value. New Researches in Management and Accounting, New Series (16), 345–360. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/2411244/
Siddiqui, F., Kong, Y. S., & Tajeddini, K. (2023). The role of corporate governance and reputation in the disclosure of corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Heliyon, 9 (5), e16055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16055
Singh, D. (2025). Corporate governance, board networks and firm performance. Journal of International Management, 31 (4), 101261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101261
Tenakwah, E. J., Chen, J., Ying, S. X., Li, Y., & Wu, H. (2024). Corporate governance, home country governance, and MNE CSR: Evidence from Ghana. Emerging Markets Review, 59, 101112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101112
Vakilifard, H. R., & Bavandpour, L. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on the performance of firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Studies, (8). [In Persian]. https://www.magiran.com/p1532674
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1986.4283976
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (13), 1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.
Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (4), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026 (91)90019-A
Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and performance: A study of corporate venture divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250170106
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026 (94)00004-E
Zhu, Y., Zhu, X., & Luo, Y. (2026). When regulations recede: Corporate governance and the divergent performance of firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 99, 103209.