Efficiency Ranking of the Knowledge-Based Economy in Iran and Other Developing Countries Using a Result-Based Management Approach and Multi-layer DEA Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Systems Management and Productivity, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)

10.22059/jed.2025.401455.654571

Abstract

Objective: Knowledge-based economy is recognized as one of the main pillars of sustainable development and a driving force for innovation and entrepreneurship in today’s world. The competitive advantage of countries is no longer primarily dependent on natural resources; rather, technological capabilities, the level of innovation, and the quality of knowledge-based infrastructure are considered the main determinants of national success. In this context, countries that can efficiently allocate their limited resources toward knowledge and technological development are capable not only of increasing productivity but also of creating the necessary environment for the growth of innovative and knowledge-based entrepreneurial activities. Therefore, assessing the efficiency of the knowledge-based economy in comparison to other countries holds not only theoretical importance but also practical and policy relevance for managers, policymakers, and entrepreneurs. Despite the high significance of this topic, a review of the literature indicates that most previous studies have been limited to simple Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models and have treated the internal structure of the knowledge-based economy as a black box. In response to this gap, the present study aims to design a systematic, multi-stage model capable of evaluating the efficiency of countries’ knowledge-based economies with greater precision, taking into account their internal complexity and multi-dimensional structure.

Method: In this study, three fundamental stages in the realization of a knowledge-based economy were first identified using the Results-Based Management (RBM) approach. These stages correspond to short-term, medium-term, and long-term results. For each stage, a set of input and output indicators was selected based on a thorough review of literature, analysis of international reports such as KAM, GII, and GKI, and consultation with both domestic and international experts. The indicators were categorized according to a hierarchical structure and thematic overlap to enable the use of advanced models. Subsequently, a multi-layer Data Envelopment Analysis (Multi-layer DEA) model was employed. Given the multi-dimensional nature of the knowledge-based economy and the multiplicity of indicators, this model provides greater discriminative power compared to classical DEA models and ensures that essential expert-selected indicators are maintained while the computational precision of the analysis is preserved. The study’s data pertains to 25 developing countries, including Iran, for the period 2016–2020, with averages calculated over the five years. The designed model allowed for the evaluation of countries’ efficiency both at each stage and in overall terms, enabling a comprehensive comparison among the selected countries.

Results: The results indicate that Iran outperformed the average of the examined countries across all three defined stages. In the first stage, which represents the short-term outcomes of the knowledge-based economy, Iran achieved high efficiency by utilizing its existing institutional, human, and infrastructural capacities more effectively than its peers. In the second stage, which reflects medium-term outcomes, Iran’s efficiency score slightly decreased but remained above the average level of the other countries. In the third stage, encompassing long-term outcomes, Iran’s performance was relatively lower compared to the previous stages; however, it still exceeded the average of the selected countries. When considering overall efficiency, Iran obtained the highest score among the countries analyzed. This superiority is not only attributable to its high performance in individual stages but also reflects a relative balance across all three stages. In contrast, some countries demonstrated strong performance in one or two stages but had lower overall efficiency due to a lack of balance among the stages. Overall, the multi-layer analysis, which considers the hierarchical structure of indicators, not only overcomes the limitations of simple DEA models in handling numerous indicators but also facilitates the identification of strengths and weaknesses of each country at various stages of knowledge-based economic development.

Conclusion: This study, by presenting a conceptual framework based on the Results-Based Management approach and utilizing a multi-layer DEA model, takes a significant step forward in evaluating the efficiency of national knowledge-based economies. Unlike previous studies, which assessed the knowledge-based economy as a black box, this research analyzes its internal components across three separate stages to clarify the contribution of each stage independently. The results demonstrate that Iran not only achieved the highest overall efficiency but also maintained a relative balance across the three stages, a factor that is crucial for achieving sustainable development. This balance indicates that Iran has been able to manage its resources in a way that simultaneously improves short-, medium-, and long-term outputs. Practically, the findings of this study can serve as valuable guidance for policymakers and planners. From an entrepreneurial perspective, the study highlights the critical importance of a knowledge-based economy in creating a stable foundation for the ......................

Keywords

Main Subjects


Andrés, A. R., Otero, A., & Amavilah, V. H. (2021). Using deep learning neural networks to predict the knowledge economy index for developing and emerging economies. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115514
APEC (2000). Towards Knowledge Based Economies in APEC, APEC Economic Committee. https://apec.org/docs/publications/2000/11
Ayan, T.Y., & Pabuccu, H. (2018) The assessment of knowledge economy efficiency: Comparing Turkey with the European Union countries. Zb. Rad. Ekon. Fak. Rij, 36, 443–464. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.443
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Columbia University Press.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chen, C. K. (2008). Construct model of the knowledge-based economy indicators. Transformations in business & Economics, 7 (2), 21-31.
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., & Rogge, N. (2011). Van Puyenbroeck, T. Constructing composite indicators with imprecise data: A proposal. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10940–10949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.136
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera Leon, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S (2022). The Global Innovation Index. Available at https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
Eidmohammadzadeh, H., Rezaei, J., Faghih-nasiri, M., & Tavakoli-faghdada-abad, M. R. (2007).
Evaluating the Efficiency of Knowledge Economy Using a Mathematical Programming Model (Iran and Regional Countries). Journal of Economic Research Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, Spring.115-135. https://joer.atu.ac.ir/article_2796.html [in persian]
Fallah, E., & Salami, R. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Knowledge-Based Economy of Iran and Selected Asian Countries, and a Roadmap for Improving Iran’s Status. Journal of Economic Development Policy, Alzahra University, Vol. 4, No. 4, Winter. 145-169. https://ieda.alzahra.ac.ir/article_3089.html [in persian]
Fucec, A. A., & Corina, M. (2014). “Knowledge economies in European Union: Romania’s position”, Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business, Vol. 15, No. 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00489-4
Guaita, J.M., Martín, J.M., Ostos, M.S., & de Castro-Pardo, M. (2021). Constructing knowledge economy composite indicators using an MCA-DEA approach. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraz., VOL. 34, NO. 1, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1782765
Kao, C. (2008). A linear formulation of the two-level DEA model. Omega, Vol. 36, pp. 958-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2008.01.002
Katuščáková, M., Capková, E., & Grečnár, J. (2023). How to Measure Knowledge Economy. Electronic Journal of knowledge management, 21(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.21.2.3025
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. A Handbook for Development Practitioners. Volume 289, World Bank Publications.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3 - 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Meng, W., Zhang, D., Qi, L., & Liu, W. (2008). Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 36, pp. 950-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2007.12.005
Moynihan, D. (2005). Why and How Do State Governments Adopt and Implement Managing for Results Reforms?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(15), pp. 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui012
Noori, J., Bonyadi-Naeini, A., & Esmaeilzadeh, M. (2016). Determining Iran’s Position in the Region in Terms of Knowledge-Based Economy Based on a Clustering Algorithm. journal of Strategic and Macro Policies, Vol. 4, Special Issue on Resistance Economy, pp. 133-155. Autumn. https://www.jmsp.ir/article_38477.html [in persian]
OECD. (1996). The Knowledge Based Economy. Paris. General distribution, OCDE/GD (96)102.
Paz-Marin, M., Gutierrez-Pena, P. A., & Martinez, C. (2015). Classification of countries’ progress toward a knowledge economy based on machine learning classification techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 562-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.008
Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261725
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press.
Shen, Y., Hermans, E., Ruan, D., Wets, G., Brijs, T., & Vanhoof, K. (2011). "A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model for hierarchical structure assessment: A case study in road safety performance evaluation". Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 15262-15272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.073
Smith, A. (1976),“An Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations”. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tan, H. B., & Hooy, C.W. (2007). The Development of East Asian Countries Towards a Knowledge-based Economy, A DEA Analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 12:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860601083538
Tan, H. B., Hooy, C.W., Manzoni, A., & Islam, S. M. N. (2008). Relative efficiency measures for the knowledge economies in the Asia Pacisic region. Journal of Modeling in Menagement, 3:2, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660810890108
UNDP & MBRF (United Nations Development Program & Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Knowledge Foundation). (2022). Global Knowledge Index. Available at: https://gki.knowledge4all.com
World Bank “Knowledge Assessment Methodology (KAM)”. (2012). World Bank Institute. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/kam