تأثیر مهربانی و شوخ‌طبعی مدیران بر جذابیت برند کارفرما با نقش میانجی‌گر کارآفرینی سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی - کمی

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

10.22059/jed.2023.355962.654152

چکیده

هدف: هدف این پژوهش تعیین تأثیر مهربانی و شوخ­طبعی مدیران بر جذابیت برند کارفرما با نقش میانجی کارآفرینی سازمانی در دانشگاه­های خصوصی استان هرات است.   
روش: این پژوهش بر اساس روش توصیفی پیمایشی  و بر اساس هدف کاربردی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل مدیران دانشگاه­های خصوصی استان هرات  است که 360 نفر از بین 714 نفر با استفاده از نمونه­گیری تصادفی طبقه­ای متناسب با حجم، انتخاب شدند. برای جمع آوری داده­های اولیه از روش پرسشنامه و داده­های ثانویه با روش کتابخانه­ای جمع­آوری گردیده است. این پژوهش شامل چهار متغیر مهربانی­مدیران، شوخ­طبعی مدیران، جذابیت برند کارفرما و کارآفرینی­سازمانی است. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها و پاسخگویی به فرضیه­های پژوهش، از تکنیک تحلیل عاملی تاییدی (CFA) و مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) استفاده شده است. بدین منظور از نرم افزار Amos24 مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است.
یافته­ها: نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که تأثیر مهربانی مدیران با ضریب مسیر  70/0 و شوخ­طبعی مدیران با داشتن ضریب مسیر 33/0 در جذابیت برند کارفرما مورد تائید قرار می­گیرد. نتایج فرضیات سوم و چهارم همچنین نشان می­دهد که مهربانی و شوخ­طبعی مدیران با ضرایب مسیر 015/0 و 03/0 نقش میانجی را در رابطه بین مهربانی و شوخ­طبعی مدیران بر جذابیت برند کارفرما بازی می­کند. بر اساس نتایج آزمون فرضیه­ها مهربانی مدیران (70 درصد) و شوخ­طبعی مدیران (33 درصد) بر جذابیت برند کارفرما تأثیر مستقیم و معنادار دارد و نقش میانجی­گری کارآفرینی سازمانی در تأثیر مهربانی و شوخ­طبعی مدیران برجذابیت برند کارفرما نیز مورد تائید قرار گرفت.
نتیجه­گیری: مهربانی و شوخ­طبعی مدیران و همچنین کارآفرینی سازمانی به عنوان متغییر میانجی، برای موفقیت دانشگاه‌ها نقش مهم و قابل توجهی را ایفا می­نمایند و از طریق این عوامل می‌توان جذابیت برند کارفرما را در این دانشگاه­ها بهبود بخشید. این سه متغیر، جذابیت برند کارفرما را در دانشگاه­های خصوصی استان هرات، در جهت مثبت هدایت می‌کنند. مدل ساختاری به‌دست‌آمده، تأثیر علی مهربانی­مدیران و شوخ­طبعی­مدیران را بر جذابیت برند کارفرمایی دانشگاه‌های خصوصی و بر کارآفرینی سازمانی نشان داد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر در دانشگاه­های استان هرات کاربرد عملی دارد. بنابراین، از منظر عملی، با توجه به یافته‌های پژوهش، و بر اساس تأثیری که کارآفرینی سازمانی بر جذابیت برند کارفرما دارد، دانشگاه‌ها می‌توانند با تدوین برنامه‌های کارآفرین­محور، از روش‌های مشارکت­محور برای همکاری کارآفرینان با یکدیگر استفاده کنند. همچنین با توجه به تأثیر قابلیت نوآوری بر عملکرد فعالیت های دانشگاهی، ایجاد فضای انگیزشی برای نوآوری، ایجاد فرصت برای کارکنان برای ارائه ایده، نادیده گرفتن شکست‌های احتمالی در ارائه نوآوری‌ها و ایجاد فضای دوستانه در محیط کار، می‌تواند قابلیت‌های نوآوری و کارآفرینی را افزایش دهد. در نهایت مهربانی مدیران، شوخ­طبعی مدیران و افزایش توانمندی­های کارآفرینی کارکنان دانشگاه، منجر به ایجاد کسب و کارهای کارآفرین­محور می­شود که ویژگی­های اصلی آن خلاقیت، نوآوری و ارزش­آفرینی و در نتیجه موجب  افزایش جذابیت برند کارفرما در  دانشگاه می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Managers' Kindness and Humor on Attractiveness of the Employer Brand with the Mediating Role of Organizational Entrepreneurship

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Afsharzada
  • Ali Shaemi Barzoki
  • hadi teimouri
Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: The study has been conducted to analyze the impact of kindness and humor of managers on the attractiveness of the employer's brand with the mediating role of organizational entrepreneurship in private universities of Herat Province.
Methodology: The present research is an applied research and descriptive survey. This study was conducted in Herat and statistical population is managers of private universities of Herat Province. 360 people were selected as a sample by stratified sampling. A questionnaire method was used to collect primary data and a library method was used for secondary data. The questionnaire was designed by different studies and also based on the conditions of the study area. This research includes four variables of managers' kindness, managers' humor, employer brand attractiveness and organizational entrepreneurship. In order to analyze the data and to test the research hypotheses, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) technique and structural equation modeling (SEM) using Amos24 software have been used.
Findings: The results of this study showed that the effect of managers' kindness on employer brand attractiveness with a path coefficient of 0.70 and a managers' humor of 0.33 is confirmed, which indicates that the managers' kindness variable predicts a total of 70% of changes in employer brand attractiveness and managers' humor variable predicts a total of 33% of changes in employer brand attractiveness. The results show that the variable of organizational entrepreneurship with path coefficients of 0.015 and 0.03 and significant coefficients of 0.002 and 0.01, as a mediator in relation between manager's kindness and humor and employer brand attractiveness was confirmed.
 According to the results of the hypotheses analysis, the model is well-fitted and all the hypotheses are confirmed. The results of hypotheses test showed that managers' kindness (70%) and managers' humor (33%) had a direct and significant effect on employer brand attractiveness, and also the organizational entrepreneurship mediation in relation between managers' kindness and humor and employer brand attractiveness was confirmed.
Conclusions: The text discusses the findings of a study that focused on the role of managers' kindness and humor, as well as organizational entrepreneurship, in the success and employer brand attractiveness of private universities. The study found that managers' kindness and humor have a positive causal effect on the employer brand attractiveness of private universities. These two factors guide the employer brand attractiveness in a positive direction. Additionally, the study highlighted the positive impact of managers' kindness and humor on organizational entrepreneurship.The practical implications of the study suggest that universities can enhance their employer brand attractiveness by developing entrepreneur-oriented programs and fostering partnerships among entrepreneurs. Creating an incentive environment for innovation, providing opportunities for employees to present ideas, and fostering a friendly workplace atmosphere can also increase innovation capabilities and employer brand attractiveness effectively. Ultimately, the study concludes that managers' kindness, managers' humor, and improving entrepreneurial capabilities within university staff contribute to the creation of entrepreneurial businesses characterized by creativity, innovation, and value creation, thereby enhancing employer brand attractiveness in universities.
Objective: The study has been conducted to analyze the impact of kindness and humor of managers on the attractiveness of the employer's brand with the mediating role of organizational entrepreneurship in private universities of Herat Province.
Methodology: The present research is an applied research and descriptive survey. This study was conducted in Herat and statistical population is managers of private universities of Herat Province. 360 people were selected as a sample by stratified sampling. A questionnaire method was used to collect primary data and a library method was used for secondary data. The questionnaire was designed by different studies and also based on the conditions of the study area. This research includes four variables of managers' kindness, managers' humor, employer brand attractiveness and organizational entrepreneurship. In order to analyze the data and to test the research hypotheses, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) technique and structural equation modeling (SEM) using Amos24 software have been used.
Findings: The results of this study showed that the effect of managers' kindness on employer brand attractiveness with a path coefficient of 0.70 and a managers' humor of 0.33 is confirmed, which indicates that the managers' kindness variable predicts a total of 70% of changes in employer brand attractiveness and managers' humor variable predicts a total of 33% of changes in employer brand attractiveness. The results show that the variable of organizational entrepreneurship with path coefficients of 0.015 and 0.03 and significant coefficients of 0.002 and 0.01, as a mediator in relation between manager's kindness and humor and employer brand attractiveness was confirmed.
 According to the results of the hypotheses analysis, the model is well-fitted and all the hypotheses are confirmed. The results of hypotheses test showed that managers' kindness (70%) and managers' humor (33%) had a direct and significant effect on employer brand attractiveness, and also the organizational entrepreneurship mediation in relation between managers' kindness and humor and employer brand attractiveness was confirmed.
Conclusions: The text discusses the findings of a study that focused on the role of managers' kindness and humor, as well as organizational entrepreneurship, in the success and employer brand attractiveness of private universities. The study found that managers' kindness and humor have a positive causal effect on the employer brand attractiveness of private universities. These two factors guide the employer brand attractiveness in a positive direction. Additionally, the study highlighted the positive impact of managers' kindness and humor on organizational entrepreneurship.The practical implications of the study suggest that universities can enhance their employer brand attractiveness by developing entrepreneur-oriented programs and fostering partnerships among entrepreneurs. Creating an incentive environment for innovation, providing opportunities for employees to present ideas, and fostering a friendly workplace atmosphere can also increase innovation capabilities and employer brand attractiveness effectively. Ultimately, the study concludes that managers' kindness, managers' humor, and improving entrepreneurial capabilities within university staff contribute to the creation of entrepreneurial businesses characterized by creativity, innovation, and value creation, thereby enhancing employer brand attractiveness in universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Attractiveness of the employer brand
  • Managers' kindness
  • Managers' humor
  • Organizational entrepreneurship
Alavikeai, S., Nasrollahivsta, L., & Golabi, F. (2016). The Effect of Social Capital on Risk-taking of Entrepreneurship Students (Case study: Faculty of Entrepreneurship in University of Tehran). Social Development & Welfare Planning, 6(25), 165-192. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2016.3856[In Persian].
Alibigi, A., Aliabadi, V., & Gravandi, S. (2012). A Structural Mode for Effect of Social Capital on Risk-Taking of Rural People: the Case of Rape Seed Farmers of Kangavar Township. Space Economy and Rural Development, 1(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/https://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1564-en.html [In Persian].
Ali-Hassan, H. (2009). Social capital theory. In Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems (1st ed., pp. 420-433). Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference.
Ashrafiyan, M. (2017). Investigating the causal relationship between social capital and organizational entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship with an emphasis on the mediating variable of psychological empowerment of faculty members of Urmia University in the academic year 2015-2016. Oroumiyeh University, Oroumiyeh [In Persian].
Babalhavaeji, F., & Zamani Rad, N. (2013). A Survey on the relationship between social capital and social entrepreneurship in the academic libraries: A case study of the central libraries of Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in Tehran. Journal of Information Systems and Services, 2(2), 67-78. https://iss.srbiau.ac.ir/article_2542.html [In Persian].
Bahmani, A., Zamanian, A., & Aslani, F. (2021). Explaining The Mediating Role of Empathy in The Relationship Between Psychological Capital and Social Entrepreneurship of Rural Women (Case Study: Choobast Village). Journal of Entrepreneurial Strategies in Agriculture, 7(14), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.52547/jea.7.14.87 [In Persian].
Bahramikhah, S. (2016). The relationship between educational justice and social entrepreneurship with the mediating role of social capital. Shahid Madani University, Tabriz [In Persian].
Banks, J. A. (1972). The sociology of social movements. Springer.
Bavarsad, B., Jaldani, S., & Ghezelbash, H. (2022). Investigating the mediating role of social entrepreneurship for social and human capital to affect operational performance. Transformation Management Journal, 13(2), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.22067/tmj.2022.31039.0
Burt, R. S. (2014). Structural Holes. In Social Stratification (4th ed., pp. 13-56). New York: Routledge.
Daru, M. U., & Gaur, A. (2013). Social entrepreneurship-a way to bring social change. Innovative journal of business and management, 2(1), 26-29. http://www.innovativejournal.in/index.php/ijbm.
Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits: What do you do when traditional sources of funding fall short. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 55-67.
Dees, J. G. (2011). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship 1 , 2. In Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (1st ed., pp. 22-30). New York: Routledge.
Do Adro, F., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, M., & Kraus, S. (2021). Social entrepreneurship orientation and performance in non-profit organizations. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(4), 1591-1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00748-4
Dredge, D. (2017). Institutional and Policy Support for Tourism Social Entrepreneurship. In Social Entrepreneurship and Tourism (pp. 35-55). Springer.
Dufays, F., & Huybrechts, B. (2014). Connecting the Dots for Social Value: A Review on Social Networks and Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 214-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.918052
El Ebrashi, R. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship Theory and Sustainable Social Impact. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2011-0013
Elahi, D. (2012). A Detailed Study of Behavioral Attributes of Social Entrepreneurs in Lucknow and Kanpur Region. Viewpoint–An International Journal of Management and Technology, 3(2), 48-55. https://doi.org/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3013703
Galbraith, C. S., Rodriguez, C. L., & Stiles, C. H. (2007). Social Capital as a Club Good: the Case of Ethnic Communities and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200710736258
Ghadiri Masom, M., Hajipour, M., Gharagozloo, H., & Ramezan Jorrniyan, M. (2016). The Analysis of the Role of Social Capital in Risk-Taking and Entrepreneurship of Rural Youth (Case Study: Tonekabon County). Research and rural planning, 16(5), 17-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.50281[In Persian].
Ghasemzadeh, A., Razzaghi, M., & Hedayati Khoshemehr, A. (2021). Investigating the Role of Social Capital on Organizational and Social Entrepreneurship of Shiraz University Staff considering the Variable Share of Knowledge Management. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 8(29), 73-103. https://doi.org/10.22054/jks.2021.58715.1417 [In Persian].
Golestani, H. (2021). The relationship between social identity and social entrepreneurship in physical education students with the mediating role of social capital. Tabiyat Modares, Tehran [In Persian].
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67(1), 130-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000271621606700118
Hashemi Romojani, N. (2011). The Relationship between Social Capital and Emotional Intelligence with Social Entrepreneurship in Iran’s Export Development Bank. Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran [In Persian].
Homan, H. (2019). A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis in Scientific Research. Tehran: Samat [In Persian].
Iyortsuun, A. S. (2016). Conceptual Overview of Social Entrepreneurship and its Relevance to Nigeria’s Third Sector. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(3), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSEI.2016.082296
Izadyar, L. (2009). Investigating the relationship between social entrepreneurship and social capital in the Ministry of Health, Medical Education and Environmental Organization (explaining the role of emotional intelligence). Tabiyat Modares, Tehran [In Persian].
Jafari Samimi, M. (2014). Investigating the relationship between social capital and social entrepreneurship in non-profit higher education institutions in Babol city. Mazandaran University, Mazandaran [In Persian].
Jiao, H. (2011). A Conceptual Model for Social Entrepreneurship Directed toward Social Impact on Society. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(2), 130-149. doi.org/10.1108/17508611111156600
Madhooshi, M., Samimi, M., & Jafari, M. H. (2015). Social Entrepreneurship & Social Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(3), 102-112. https://doi.org/http://www.publicscienceframework.org/journal/ajefm[In Persian].
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
Majid, I. A., & Koe, W. L. (2012). Sustainable Entrepreneurship (SE): A Revised Model Based on Triple Bottom Line (TBL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6), 293-310. https://doi.org/www.hrmars.com/journals
Maleki, Z. (2013). Investigating the social entrepreneurship of agricultural students with an emphasis on social capital (case study: undergraduate students of the Faculty of Agriculture). Razi University, Kermanshah.
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition. Presented at the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Stanford, California: Leland Stanford Jr. University.
Mesbahi Jahromi, N. A., Adibzadeh, M., Nakhaei, S., & Hosseini, S. M. (2015). The Impact of Social Capital On Entrepreneurship and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Examine the Moderator Role of Emotional Intelligence). Social Capital Management, 2(3), 367-392. https://doi.org/10.22059/jscm.2015.56529 [In Persian].
Moradi, A., Maghsoudi Ganjeh, Y., & Bayati, Y. (2018). The Impact of Social Capital on Social Entrepreneurship of Managers of NGOs in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. Journal of Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 5(13), 41-52. https://doi.org/http://shij.ir/ASMD/upload/ASMD/Content/190120_15/ASMD-No13-Digital.pdf [In Persian].
Nahapiet, J. (2009). Capitalizing on Connections: Social Capital and Strategic Management. In V. O. Bartkus & J. H. Davis (eds.), (V. O. Bartkus & J. H. Davis, eds.), Social Capital: Reaching Out, Reaching In (1st ed., pp. 205-236). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?id=KUj4cjvxUX8C.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Nash, M. T. A. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise. In The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management (Vol. 18, pp. 262-300). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Njuguna, L. N. (2015). Factors Influencing Participation of Youth Entrepreneurs in Enterprise Development: the Case of Limuru Sub County, Kiambu County, Kenya. University Of Nairobi, Nairobi , Kenya. erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/90534/Njuguna.
Omrani, Z. (2009). Prioritizing factors affecting social entrepreneurship in Iran from the perspective of social activists. Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran [In Persian].
Pangriya, R. (2019). Hidden Aspects of Social Entrepreneurs’ Life: a Content Analysis. Pangriya Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(66), 1-19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0199-6
Perrini, F., & Vurro, C. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: Innovation and Social Change Across Theory and Practice. In (M. Robinson J & J. Hockerts, eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 57-85). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_5.
Rahimi, S., Sadat Naseri, N., & Fariborzi, E. (2022). Designing a Social Entrepreneurship Development Model with a Social Capital Approach (Case Study of Imam Khomeini Relief Committee in Fars Province). Political Sociology of Iran, 5(5), 161-187. https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.334850.3289 [In Persian].
Rastgar, A., Golshahi, B., & Dorostkar Ahmadi, N. (2018). Investigating Effective Factors on Impowerment of Street and Working Children: The Role of Social Capital and Social Entrepreneurship. Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development), 12(4), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.22055/qjsd.2018.13680 [In Persian].
Rezaei, B., & Abdolkarim, S. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Social Capital and Social Entrepreneurship among the Employees of Razi University of Kermanshah. Presented at The First International Humanities Conference with a Native-Islamic Approach and with an Emphasis on New Researches, Tehran: The First International Humanities Conference with a Native-Islamic Approach and with an Emphasis on New Researches. https://doi.org/https://www.symposia.ir/ICH01[In Persian].
Roslan, M. H. H., Hamid, S., Ijab, M. T., Yusop, F. D., & Norman, A. A. (2022). Social Entrepreneurship in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 588-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1859354
Rossi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2013). Open Innovation System and New Form of Investment: Venture Capital’s Role in Innovation. In A. Thrassou & D. Vrontis (eds.), (A. Thrassou & D. Vrontis, eds.), Innovative Business Practices: Prevailing a Turbulent Era (p. 168). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2021). The Theory of Economic Development (1st ed.). 1, London: Routledge.
Sen: (2007). Ashoka’s Big Idea: Transforming the World through Social Entrepreneurship. Futures, 39(5), 534-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.10.013
Zahra, S., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes and Ethical Challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
Zahra, S., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). Globalization of Social Entrepreneurship Opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.43
Shockley, G. E., & Frank, M. (2011). The Functions of Government in Social Entrepreneurship: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 3(3), 181-198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2011.01036.x
Smith, B. R., Kistruck, G. M., & Cannatelli, B. (2016). The Impact of Moral Intensity and Desire for Control on Scaling Decisions in Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 677-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2447-6
Suryandharu, T., Sanusi, A., & Harsono, H. (2019). The Influence of The Motivation, Leadership and Social Networking for the Formation of Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics, 1(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijase.v1i1.32
Terziev, V., & Arabska, E. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship in Terms of Social Values and Social Impact. nternational Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 7(4), 41-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3142936
Thorgren, S., & Omorede, A. (2018). Passionate Leaders in Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring an African Context. Business & Society, 57(3), 481-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315612070
Urban, B. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Economy: A Focus on the Institutional Environment and Social Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy. Managing Global Transitions, 11(1), 3-25. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mgt:youmgt:v:11:y:2013:i:1:p:3-25
Wang, H., Wang, L., & Li, J. (2007). The Effect of Social Network in Social Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Chinese Case Study (pp. 4213-4216). Presented at the 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Shanghai, China: International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICOM.2007.1039
Wanyoko, A. M. (2013). Influence of Business Incubation Services on Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(7), 454-468. http://ijsse.org/articles/ijsse_v1_i7_454_468.pdf
Weber, C., & Kratzer, J. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship, Social Networks and Social Value Oreation: A Quantitative Analysis among Social Entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 5(3), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2013.055291
Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating Social Entrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001
Westlund, H., & Gawell, M. (2012). Building Social Capital For Social Entrepreneurship. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 101-116. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00456.x
Yadegar, N., Me’Mariani, M. M., & Sedgh Amiz, A. R. (2014). Social Entrepreneurial Intention: Interplay of Social Entrepreneurial Attitude, Financial Security and Social Capital as Antecedents. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 7(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2014.51559 [In Persian].
Yadolahi Farsi, J., & Razavi, S. M. (2011). The Role of Human and Social Capital in Youth Entrepreneurship in Korbal Rural Areas. Human Geography Research, 44(1), 103-116. https://jhgr.ut.ac.ir/article_24528_en.html?lang=en [In Persian].