Journal of  Entrepreneurship Development

Journal of Entrepreneurship Development

Diagnosing the Causes of Technology-Based Startup Failure in the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: A Study of Companies Located in the Markazi Province Science and Technology Park

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Management department. Administration sciences and economy faculty. Arak university. Arak. iran
2 Management department. Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Arak University, Arak. Iran
10.22059/jed.2026.420413.654732
Abstract
Objective: Background and Objective: Technology-based startups play a significant role in entrepreneurial ecosystems due to their contribution to innovation development, knowledge commercialization, specialized employment, and economic transformation. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of these businesses fail during the early stages of their operations. The failure of technology-based startups is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that cannot be attributed solely to insufficient financial resources, managerial weaknesses, or lack of market access, as institutional, ecosystem, strategic, financial, and market-related factors interact with one another and may reinforce each other through feedback mechanisms. Accordingly, this study aims to identify and model the causal structure of factors affecting the failure of technology-based startups within the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Markazi Province, Iran.


Method: In terms of purpose, this study is applied and developmental, while in terms of nature and methodology, it adopts a mixed-methods (qualitative–quantitative) approach. In the qualitative phase, data obtained from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and coded with MAXQDA software. In the quantitative phase, the causal relationships among the identified factors were analyzed using the Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) approach and modeled using Mental Modeler. The data collection instrument was in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The study was conducted during the spring and summer of 2026. The statistical population consisted of technology-based startups located in the Markazi Province Science and Technology Park. Purposive and judgmental sampling was employed, and interviews were conducted with 24 startup managers and experts until theoretical saturation was reached. In addition, a pairwise comparison questionnaire was used to examine the causal relationships among the identified factors and determine the strength of their effects using fuzzy values. Subsequently, a fuzzy relational matrix was constructed, and the centrality, influence, and dependence of the variables were analyzed. MICMAC analysis was then conducted to identify driving, linkage, and dependent variables, while dynamic simulation was employed to examine the behavior of the system over time. Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were also conducted to identify leverage points and assess the consequences of alternative interventions.


Results: Overall, 18 key variables were incorporated into the model and organized into five overarching themes: unfavorable institutional atmosphere, provincial ecosystem deficiencies, strategic incapacities, market interaction deadlock, and intensifying events. The results indicated that the failure of technology-based startups is not a linear process but rather the outcome of a network of interactions among multiple factors. Macroeconomic turbulence, monetary and banking instability, and geographical isolation were identified as driving factors. In contrast, capital imbalance, industry trust deadlock, and local brain drain were classified as linkage and critical factors and emerged as particularly important leverage points within the system. Furthermore, incorrect pricing, validation failure, and resistance to adoption were primarily positioned as outcome variables within the network. The results of the dynamic simulation showed that, if the existing conditions persist, the system moves toward an undesirable equilibrium state, with variables such as resistance to adoption, validation failure, incorrect pricing, capital imbalance, and industry trust deadlock stabilizing at relatively higher levels. The findings also demonstrated that interventions focused solely on macro-level factors are insufficient to break the failure cycle and that simultaneous interventions targeting leverage points at the financial, market, industry, and human-capital levels are necessary.


Conclusion: The findings indicate that the failure of technology-based startups in Markazi Province should be understood as a systemic, multilevel, and self-reinforcing phenomenon. The main implication of the study is that isolated and short-term support policies, such as financial assistance or general training programs, are unlikely to generate sustainable effects unless the interrelationships among capital, validation, industry trust, market access, and human capital are addressed simultaneously. Accordingly, the development of stage-based financing mechanisms, strengthening startup–industry linkages, establishing systematic market-validation mechanisms, improving pricing practices, retaining human capital, and developing an early-warning system for startup failure are recommended as key practical interventions. The proposed model can serve as a useful tool for diagnosing systemic problems, identifying leverage points, and supporting the decision-making of policymakers and managers within the startup ecosystem of Markazi Province.
Keywords
Subjects

hmadpour Daryani, M., Mehran, K. F., Sakhdari, K., & Davari, A. (2025). Analyzing causal 
relationships of success factors in corporate accelerators using the DEMATEL method: A practical 
approach to innovation management. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 18(2), 213–234. 
https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2025.391154.654498 [In Persian] 
Ancona, A., Cinelli, M., Ferraro, G., & Iovanella, A. (2023). Network-based principles of 
entrepreneurial ecosystems: A case study of a start-up network. Small Business Economics, 61, 
1497–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00738-6 
Ardianwiliandri, R., Hasanefendic, S., & Bossink, B. (2026). Technological capabilities for value 
creation in tech startups under turbulence. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and 
Complexity, 12, 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100704 
Battisti, S., Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2022). Creating new tech entrepreneurs with digital platforms: 
Meta-organizations for shared value in data-driven retail ecosystems. Technological Forecasting 
& Social Change, 175, 121392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121392 
Blank, S., & Eckhardt, J. T. (2024). The lean startup as an actionable theory of entrepreneurship. Journal 
of Management, 50(8), 3012-3034. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241243276 
Brandsma, T., van de Wetering, R., & Stoffers, J. (2025). Factors that contribute to digital innovation 
readiness: A state-of-the-art comprehensive scoping review with expert consultation. Journal of 
Advances in Management Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR
11-2024-0423 
Dhir, A., N., M., Nawaz, R., & Kaur, P. (2024). How do we pivot? Facilitators, inhibitors, and strategies 
of tech healthcare startups before, during, and after a crisis. Technological Forecasting and Social 
Change, 207, 123606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123606 
Entezari, Y., & Mahjub, H. (2020). Structural analysis of the national innovation ecosystem: Utilizing 
global data for Iranian policy making. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 3(1), 
87-118. https://doi.org/10.22034/qjimdo.2020.207905.1221 [In Persian] 
Granot, N., Tzafrir, S., & Tzabbar, D. (2026). Steering through the storm: Managing startup growth and 
pivots. Organizational Dynamics, 55, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101205 
Greco, F. (2023). Startup ecosystems: Components for an interpretative model and international 
benchmarks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34414-5 
Karjalainen, K., & Vilko, J. (2026). Developing regional innovation ecosystem for Industry 4.0 needs. 
Procedia Computer Science, 277, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.12.003 
Kartika, F. (2024). The role of innovation in startup success: A comprehensive review. Advances: Jurnal 
Ekonomi & Bisnis, 2(1), 46-58. 
Li, L., Meng, Z., Zhao, W., & Du, X. (2025). Mapping the digital innovation ecosystem with machine 
learning: Efficiency, drivers, and regional heterogeneity across China’s provinces. Information 
Processing and Management, 62, 104269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104269 
1405
،
3، شماره
دوره
،
116 
https://jed.ut.ac.ir/ 
19توسعه کارآفرینی
Lizarelli, F. L., Torres, A. F., Antony, J., Ribeiro, R., Salentijn, W., Fernandes, M. M., & Campos, A. 
T. (2022). Critical success factors and challenges for Lean Startup: A systematic literature review. 
The TQM Journal, 34(3), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0177 
Mokhtari Hasan Abad, S., Shavvalpour, S., & Hosseini Shakib, M. (2022). Typology of failure factors 
for technological start-ups in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector. Iranian 
Journal of Information Management, 7(2), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.22034/aimj.2022.156214 [In 
Persian] 
NoormohammadiNajafabadi, R., Sajjadi, S. M., & Davari, A. (2026). A study on the process of 
confronting growth barriers in university-based knowledge startups: A grounded theory research 
utilizing the Glaserian approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 19(2), 1–36. 
https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2026.402631.654592 [In Persian] 
Nouri, F., & Hoseini, S. S. (2024). Pathology of the implementation of innovation and technology 
ecosystem policies in line with the development of provincial investments. Journal of Exalted 
Governance, 4(4), 81-103. [In Persian] 
Özesmi, U., & Özesmi, S. L. (2004). Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: A multi-step 
fuzzy 
cognitive 
mapping 
approach. 
Ecological 
Modelling, 
176(1–2), 
43–64. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027 
Papageorgiou, E. I., & Salmeron, J. L. (2013). Methods and algorithms for fuzzy cognitive map-based 
modeling. In Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering: From fundamentals to 
extensions and learning algorithms (pp. 1–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642
39739-4_1 
Santisteban, J., Mauricio, D., & Cachay, O. (2021). Critical success factors for technology-based 
startups. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 42(4), 397–421. 
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2021.114266 
Sharma, P., Mehta, R., & Verma, A. (2025). Analyzing resilience and growth strategies of Indian tech 
start-ups: A mixed-method study during and after COVID-19. Journal of Asia-Pacific Marketing 
Research, 16(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-11-2024-0423 
Shojaei, P., Nikbakht, A., Lalegani, M. M., & Mashayekhpour, S. (2025). Prioritizing CSFs to overcome 
startups’ obstacles through a rough-MADM framework: A case study of Iranian startups. Foresight, 
27(5), 929–955. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-06-2024-0120 
Stam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 
56(2), 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6 
Wasi, K., Hasan, Z., Parameswar, N., Patnaik, J., & Ganesh, M. P. (2025). Analyzing factors influencing 
competitiveness of Indian tech start-ups: Modified total interpretive structural model (m-TISM) 
approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 74(4), 1201–1240. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2024-0032 
Wei, C.-P., Fang, E. S.-H., Yang, C.-S., & Liu, P.-J. (2025). To shine or not to shine: Startup success 
prediction by exploiting technological and venture-capital-related features. Information & 
Management, 62, 104152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104152 
Zhang, X., Hu, H., Zhou, C., & Dong, E. (2024). Is a rural entrepreneurial ecosystem conducive to the 
improvement of entrepreneurial performance? Evidence from typical counties of rural 
entrepreneurship 
and 
innovation 
in 
China. 
Land, 
13(11), 
1822. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111822 
Zhao, F., Zhao, Y., & Li, S. (2024). How does intellectual property system affect technology 
entrepreneurship: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities. Asia Pacific Economic Literature, 
38, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12405 
Zheng, F., Sun, H., Ren, R., & Chang, W. (2024). Impact of the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem on 
startup performance: An empirical study from China. International Review of Economics & 
Finance, 96, 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103611 
Zhou, J., & Cen, W. (2024). Digital entrepreneurial ecosystem embeddedness, knowledge dynamic 
capabilities, and user entrepreneurial opportunity development in China: The moderating role of 
entrepreneurial learning. Sustainability, 16(11), 4343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114343