A Functional Model of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Based on AI Adoption: From Technological Infrastructure to Networking and Institutional Support

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Entrepreneurship Department, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin

2 Department, of Industrial Management Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin

3 Information Management Department, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin

10.22059/jed.2026.405119.654600

Abstract

ABSTRACT




Objective: The rapid acceleration of technological advancements in recent decades—particularly in the field of artificial intelligence (AI)—has fundamentally transformed the structure, functioning, and dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Intelligent technologies have not only reshaped decision-making models, value-creation processes, and innovation patterns, but have also redefined the interactions among key ecosystem actors, including government, universities, industry, startups, policy-making institutions, and support organizations. Despite the widespread integration of AI in various industries, a comprehensive understanding of how this technology influences the functional components of entrepreneurial ecosystems—and the multi-dimensional mechanisms that shape its adoption—remains limited. Previous studies have predominantly focused on technological or organizational dimensions while overlooking critical aspects such as digital infrastructure, cultural and social mechanisms, institutional policy-making, multi-level interactions, and ecosystem support networks. Accordingly, the present study aims to develop a comprehensive functional model of the entrepreneurial ecosystem based on AI adoption, one that identifies, explains, and structures the key components to provide an integrated and multi-layered perspective on the process of AI adoption in digital entrepreneurship contexts. This research seeks to address the existing gap in the literature, which largely stems from the absence of a systemic and functional approach to the infrastructural, cultural, policy, institutional, and network dimensions of AI adoption, and offers a scientific and practical guideline for managers, policymakers, and entrepreneurs.
Method: This study is applied in purpose and descriptive–analytical in nature, employing a qualitative research approach. To accurately identify the functional dimensions of an entrepreneurial ecosystem based on AI adoption, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 experts in the fields of management, innovation, digital technologies, entrepreneurship, policy-making, and technology development in Iran. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used to select participants with substantial practical experience and deep familiarity with technology-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using MAXQDA software. Data analysis followed the thematic analysis method in three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding.
To enhance the accuracy and validity of the findings, several reliability and validity assessments were conducted, including Cohen’s Kappa (0.78) to evaluate inter-coder agreement, Krippendorff’s Alpha (0.74) to assess coding reliability, all of which confirmed the appropriate fit of the thematic structure. To enrich the conceptual analysis, more than 50 domestic and international academic articles were reviewed and incorporated into the theoretical comparison process. All stages of data collection followed research ethics principles, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Results: The qualitative analysis led to the extraction of 270 initial codes, which were refined and integrated into 41 conceptual indicators, 14 sub-themes, and ultimately 5 core categories. These main categories include:
Technological Infrastructure (digital infrastructure capacity, data infrastructure, cloud computing, access to digital platforms),
Technological Adoption (cultural readiness for AI, technological knowledge management, technological learning, and analysis of failure),
Technological Innovation (technological leadership, data-driven value creation, business model scalability, personalization, and digital market development),
Policy-Making and Institutional Support (facilitating policies, ethical standards, regulatory frameworks, and university–industry–government interactions),
Ecosystem Networking and Support (support networks, accelerators, angel investors, enabling institutions, and access to financial resources).
The findings show that successful AI adoption is a multi-dimensional and systemic phenomenon, in which digital and data infrastructures form the foundational layer. Factors such as cultural readiness, societal attitudes toward AI, human capability, technological learning, analysis of failure, and digital skill development are essential for sustainable adoption. At the institutional level, facilitating policies, transparent ethical standards, data governance mechanisms, and regulatory structures play a vital role in reducing risks and enabling adoption. The results further reveal that multi-level interactions and network-based collaborations among government, universities, industry, startups, and innovation institutions constitute one of the most influential drivers of AI adoption and institutionalization. Indicators such as inter-ecosystem collaboration, venture capital investment, development of international digital markets, and active support networks contribute significantly to the resilience and sustainability of AI-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems.
Conclusion: The final model demonstrates that AI adoption within entrepreneurial ecosystems is not merely a technological or organizational decision but rather an integrated phenomenon requiring synergy among digital infrastructures, human capacities, cultural readiness, effective policy-making, and strong ecosystem support networks. The model provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing and strengthening AI-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems and can serve as a foundation for designing technology development strategies, support programs, national policies, and practical action plans. Furthermore, the findings enrich the theoretical foundations of technology management and entrepreneurial ecosystems and pave the way for future research on systemic interactions, data governance, and dynamic modeling within AI-based entrepreneurial systems.
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Agasty, S., Tarannum, F., & Narula, S. A. (2023). Sustainability innovation index for micro, small and medium enterprises and their support ecosystems based on an empirical study in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, 137793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137793

    Aliabadi, V., Movahedi, R., Yaghoubi‑Farani, A., and Papzan, A., (2020). Proposing a conceptual model of the academic entrepreneurial ecosystem in agricultural faculties of western Iran. Agricultural Education Management Research, 52: 3–26. https://sid.ir/paper/956526/fa.[in Persian].

    Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12 (1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266

    Baghersad, V., Davari, A., and Azizi, M., (2019). Fuzzy analysis of the relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystem dimensions and competitiveness. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 14 (55): 107–129. https://sid.ir/paper/371385/fa.[in Persian].

    Battisti, S., & Brem, A. (2020). Digital entrepreneurs in technology-based spinoffs: An analysis of hybrid value creation in retail public–private partnerships to tackle showrooming. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36 (10), 1780–1792. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0051

    Battisti, S., Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2022). Creating new tech entrepreneurs with digital platforms: Meta-organizations for shared value in data-driven retail ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121392

    Big Agha, M., Shirvani, A., and Khazaei, M., (2015). Designing an ecosystem model for enhancing entrepreneurship in Iranian cinema. Cultural Management, 9 (29): 107–122. https://sid.ir/paper/199658/fa.[in Persian].

    Campos-Blázquez, J. R., Martín-García, S., & Cárdenas-Muñoz, M. (2024). Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem through Open Innovation fostered by public policies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9 (4), 100587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100587

    Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035

    Chae, B. K., & Goh, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurs in artificial intelligence and data analytics: Who are they? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6 (3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030056

    Davari, A., Seyyedbari, L., and Baghersad, V., (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystem factors in Iran based on Eisenberg model. Entrepreneurship Development, 10 (1): 101–120. https://sid.ir/paper/131280/fa.[in Persian].

    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791

    Faghih, N., Bonyadi, E. & Sarreshtehdari, L. Comparison of the entrepreneurial motivation in different economic groups. J Glob Entrepr Res 11, 29–39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-021-00268-z

    Farahmandmehr, A., Sharififar, F., and Nikbakhsh, R., (2019). Designing and explaining the framework of the entrepreneurial ecosystem in sport. Sport Management and Development, 8 (1): 63–83. https://sid.ir/paper/375224/fa.[in Persian].

    Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Veiga, P. M. (2023). The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in the SME internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113603

    Ghosh, S. (2025). Developing artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities for data-driven business model innovation: Roles of organizational adaptability and leadership. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 75, 101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101851

    Gutiérrez Navas, E. B., Sarmiento Suarez, J. E., Ramírez Montañez, J., & Rincón Quintero, Y. A. (2025). Determining factors for the digitization of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in Ibero-America. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10 (1), 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100631

    Hannigan, T. R., Briggs, A. R., Valadao, R., Seidel, M.-D. L., & Jennings, P. D. (2022). A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging AI entrepreneurial ecosystem. Research Policy, 51 (9), 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104315

    Hosseini‑Nia, Gh., and Aliabadi, V., (2019). Gap analysis of the current and desired status of entrepreneurial ecosystem dimensions in knowledge‑based agricultural firms in Hamedan and Kermanshah provinces. Cooperation and Agriculture, 2 (12): 220–240. https://sid.ir/paper/377044/fa.[in Persian].

    Hosseinpour, M., Rezaei, B., and Khodaei, A., (2021). The role of spouses in the entrepreneurial ecosystem of women: A meta‑synthesis approach. Women in Development and Politics (Women’s Studies), 19 (3): 351–377. https://sid.ir/paper/403740/fa.[in Persian].

    Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88 (6), 40–50.

    Jame-Bozorgey, M., and Meygun-Pouri, M.R., (2023). Designing a model for the development of the academic entrepreneurial ecosystem with a cultural environment approach in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 54: 557–574.[in Persian].

    Jame-Bozorgey, M.J., and Meygun-Pouri, M.R., (2021). Culture of the academic entrepreneurial ecosystem as a driver of social entrepreneurship development. Cultural Management, 14 (51): 45–57. https://sid.ir/paper/517616/fa.[in Persian].

    Karimi, A., Soltani, M., and Kashaf-Azar, R., (2020). Designing a growth‑generative entrepreneurial ecosystem for organic growth of airlines. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 3 (2): 1–24. https://sid.ir/paper/405464/fa.[in Persian].

    Keykha, A., and Pourkarimi, J., (2021). Recreating the entrepreneurial ecosystem model of third‑generation universities. Marine Science Education, 8 (24): 125–144. https://sid.ir/paper/964879/fa.[in Persian].

    Khurana, I., Dutta, D. K., & Ghura, A. S. (2022). SMEs and digital transformation during a crisis: The emergence of resilience as a second-order dynamic capability in an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 150, 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048

    Kuckertz, A. (2020). Startups in times of crisis – A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169

    Mady, K., Anwar, I., Aboelmaged, M., & Sulub, M. A. (2025). Digital entrepreneurial platform capability: Instrument development and validation, and its impact on entrepreneurial performance. Technology in Society, 82, 102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102886

    Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. OECD LEED Paper Series, No. 2014/01. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz6t4t2w1mr-en

    Matekaire, K., & Siriram, R. (2025). An overview of factors influencing the adoption of IoT payment systems in South Africa’s small and medium-sized retail enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11 (3), 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100566

    Melo, I. C., Queiroz, G. A., Alves Junior, P. N., de Sousa, T. B., Yushimito, W. F., & Pereira, J. (2023). Sustainable digital transformation in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A review on performance. Heliyon, 9 (3), e13908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13908

    Miah, M. T., Aiupova, N., Erdei-Gally, S., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2025). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystems: Then vs. now – a future perspectives. Digital Business, 5 (1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100110

    Moreira, L. L., Pinto, S. S., Costa, L., & Araújo, N. (2025). Evaluating digital transformation in small and medium enterprises using the Alkire-Foster method. Heliyon, 11 (2), e41838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41838

    Mousavi, S.H., Salehi-Imran, E., Mousavi, S.M., and Farasatkhah, M., (2019). Identifying barriers to the development of the entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Marine Science Education, 6 (19): 35–51. https://sid.ir/paper/261982/fa.[in Persian].

    Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254

    Nautwima, J. P., Obrenovic, B., Asa, A. R., Johannes, H. N., & Abueva, N. (2025). Determinants of technology adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100919

    Nylund, P. A., Ferràs-Hernández, X., Pareras, L., & Brem, A. (2022). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems based on enabling technologies: Evidence from synthetic biology. Journal of Business Research, 149, 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.071

    Oliveira, J. P., & Rua, O. L. (2025). Innovation ecosystems and open innovation on micro-enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11 (1), 100443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100443

    Radicic, D., & Petković, S. (2023). Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122474

    Rezaei, B., Naderi, N., and Soleimani, M., (2020). Strategies for developing the entrepreneurial ecosystem in rural areas of Kermanshah County. Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 9 (1): 67–94. https://sid.ir/paper/524219/fa.[in Persian].

    Saeedi-Aghdam, M., Alam-Tabriz, A., Sarrafizadeh Qazvini, A., and Zand-Hessami, H., (2019). Simulation of crowdfunding in the technological entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Management Studies, 10 (37): 141–160. https://sid.ir/paper/181549/fa.[in Persian].

    Sayevand, Z., Elami, F., and Shams-Morakani, Gh., (2020). Identifying the educational entrepreneurial ecosystem, its opportunities and threats. Management on Training Organizations, 9 (1): 309–331. https://sid.ir/paper/395962/fa.[in Persian].

    Setiawan, B., Pamungkas, B., Mekaniwati, A., & Kusuma, P. M. (2025). The strategic role of digital transformation, dynamic and agile capabilities for the performance of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). The Bottom Line, 38 (2), 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2024-0120

    Spigel, B. (2017). The relational nature of entrepreneurial ecosystems: Insights from regional entrepreneurial practices. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167

    Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23 (9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

    Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49, 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5

    Toorajipour, R., Oghazi, P., & Palmié, M. (2024). Data ecosystem business models: Value propositions and value capture with Artificial Intelligence of Things. International Journal of Information Management, 78, 102804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102804

    Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28 (2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

    Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2024). Digital capabilities and metaverse entrepreneurial performance: Role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9 (4), 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100617

    Yaghoubi, N.M., Dehghani, M., and Omidvar, M., (2018). Establishing green human resource management in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Organizational Resources Management Research, 8 (4): 131–149. https://sid.ir/paper/372818/fa.[in Persian].

    Yang, Z., Chang, J., Huang, L., & Mardani, A. (2023). Digital transformation solutions of entrepreneurial SMEs based on an information error-driven T-spherical fuzzy cloud algorithm. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102384

    Zaheer, H., Breier, M., & Khan, S. (2019). Developing the platform business model: Reviewing diverse approaches and highlighting open issues. Journal of Business Research, 101, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.011

    Zheng, F., Sun, H., Ren, R., & Chang, W. (2024). Impact of the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem on startup performance: An empirical study from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96 (Part B), 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103611

    • Zhang, H., & Wu, D. (2022). The impact of transport infrastructure on rural industrial integration: Spatial spillover effects and spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Land, 11(7), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071116
    • Zhang, S., Feng, Y., Zeng, X., Jiang, X., & Chang, Y. (2025). Study on the Empowerment of Women's Participation in Rural Tourism Under the Background of Rural Revitalization Take the Rural Revitalization Demonstration Area of Mount Tai Jiunu Peak as an Example. Humanities and Social Science Research, 8(5), p19-p19. https://doi.org/10.30560/hssr.v8n5p19
    • Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Yan, S., Wang, W., & Xue, Y. (2023). Alleviating relative poverty in rural China through a diffusion schema of returning farmer entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 15(2), 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021380
Journal of Entrepreneurship Development
Volume 19, Issue 2
July 2026
Pages 186-214

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics