بررسی نقش ابعاد کارآفرینی دانش‌بنیان در عملکرد تحقیق و توسعة کارآفرینانة نظام تحقیقات کشاورزی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی - کمی

نویسنده

استادیار دانشکدة اقتصاد و توسعة کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی نقش ابعاد کارآفرینی دانش‌بنیان به‌منظور دستیابی به عملکرد نوآورانة مؤسسه‌های تحقیقات کشاورزی انجام گرفت که به روش تحلیل علی ارتباطی و از نوع تحلیل ماتریس کوواریانس و به روش توصیفی- همبستگی است. جامعة‌ آماری دربرگیرندة 2768 نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی و پژوهشگران مراکز و ایستگاه‌های پژوهشی وابسته به وزارت جهاد کشاورزی بود. برای نمونه‌گیری از شش منطقة جغرافیایی کشور- براساس تقسیم‌بندی وزارت جهاد کشاورزی- یک استان به‌تصادف انتخاب شد و از میان آن‌ها به روش تصادفی و با رعایت انتساب متناسب 320 نفر (بر حسب محاسبة فرمول کوکران) انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه‌ای محقق‌ساخته در قالب طیف لیکرت بود. برای سنجش روایی آن از روش روایی تشخیصی با استفاده از شاخص میانگین واریانس استخراج‌شده و برای تعیین پایایی از روش پایایی ترکیبی استفاده شد. از بستة نرم‌افزاری Lisrel نسخة 8/8 بهره گرفته شد. یافته‌های پژوهش بیانگر آن است که کاربست دانش و جهت­گیری کارآفرینانه در شکل‌گیری کارآفرینی دانش‌بنیان، اشتراک دانش بین‌سازمانی، نوآوری مدیریتی، فرایندی و فناوری نقش معنی‌داری دارند. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد عملکرد تحقیق و توسعة کارآفرینانه به سه بعد اشتراک دانش بین‌سازمانی، کاربست دانش و جهت­گیری کارآفرینانه و کارآفرینی دانش‌بنیان وابسته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship Dimensions as Antecedents for Entrepreneurial Research and Development Performance: Evidences from Iranian Agricultural Research System

نویسنده [English]

  • Amir Alambeigi
Assistant Professor. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of this paper was to study knowledge intensive entrepreneurship role in innovative performance in agricultural technology management by entrepreneurial R&D definition implementing as a casual-effect research by using casual model. Statistical population of the study was consisted of 2768 agricultural research specialists in Iran, one out of each six regional groups of provinces (n= 25) was randomly selected and 320 researchers were randomly selected from theses six provinces based on Cochran’s sampling methodology. Research instrument consisted Likert scale for latent variables measurement. The results of research indicate that among knowledge intensive entrepreneurship antecedents in agricultural technology management process knowledge sharing among organizations, innovation, knowledge utilization and entrepreneurship orientation have a significant role. Along with entrepreneurial R&D dimensions as an innovative results criteria, are depended on knowledge sharing among organizations, knowledge utilization and entrepreneurship orientation and there is no significant role for management, process and technology innovation in this case.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship
  • Research and Development (R&D)
  • Technology Management and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

مراجع

  1.  

    1. Adams, R., Bessant, J. and Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: a review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47.
    2. Alvarez, S. A., and Barney, J. B. (2001). How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Executive, 15 (1), 139–148.
    3. Barbolla, A. M. B. and Corredera, J. R. C. (2009). Critical factors for success in university-industry research projects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21, 599–616.
    4. Brannback, M. Renko, M. and Carsrud, A., (2009). Knowledge Intensive entrepreneurship: networking within and across boundaries. Retrieved 15 Dec 2009. http://www.Turkuschools.net/papers/B15. 4602533633.pdf. 2-5.
    5. Boateng, H. and Narteh, A. (2013). Knowledge application in Ghanaian industries. Journal of Information Development. 20(1). 1-10.
    6. Chang, S.C. and Lee, M., (2008). The linkage between knowledge accumulation capability and organizational innovation. Journal of technology management & innovation. 12(1). 3-20.
    7. Chun-Yao, T. (2009), Technological innovation and knowledge network in Asia, Evidence from comparison of information and communication technologies among six countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(1), 654-663.
    8. Cooper, R.G. (2007). Managing technology development projects, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 35(1). 67-76.
    9. Hong, J. Heikkinen, j. and Blomqvist, K., (2010). Culture and Knowledge Co-Creation in R&D Collaboration between MNCs and Chinese Universities. Journal of Management Studies, 45(10).23-80.
    10. Hult, G. T. M. Snow, CH. C. Kandemir, D. (2003). The Role of Entrepreneurship in Building Cultural Competitiveness in Different Organizational Types. Journal of Management. 29(3).401–426.
    11. Hindle, K. And Yencken, J. (2004). Public research commercialization, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: an integrated model. Technovation. 24(1), 793–803.
    12. ICC (2007).Technology, Technology Transfer and Enabling Environments. Prepared by the Commission on Environment and Energy.www.iccwbo.org. 1.
    13. Ireland, R. D. Kuratko, D. F. and Morris, M, H. (2006).A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: innovation at all levels. Journal of Business Strategy. 27(2). pp. 21-30.
    14. Jimenez, D. J. N., Valle, R.S. Espallardo, M. H. (2008). Fostering innovation; the role of market orientation and organizational learning. European Journal of Innovation Management. 11(3), 389-412.
    15. Kim, D. Y. And Kumar, V.,( 2009). A framework for prioritization of intellectual capital indicators in R&D, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2). 277-293.
    16. Kirschbaum, J. B. (2003). TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. A Brief Survey: Facts, Strategies & Tactics. UCSF Office of Technology Management.www. UCSF.net.
    17. Krauss, R. (2005). Linking Intrapreneurship and Innovation. Institute for Technology and Management. Unpublished thesis. 25-31.
    18. Koners, U. and Goffin, K. (2005). Learning from new product development projects: an exploratory study, Journal of Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(4). 334-44.
    19. Leitner, K-H. And Warden, C. (2004). Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 15(1). 33-51.
    20. Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Zhao, Y. (2006). The Role of Market and Entrepreneurship Orientation and Internal Control in the New Product Development Activities of Chinese Firms. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management. 35(3). 336–347.
    21. Miller DJ, Fern MJ, Cardinal LB. (2007). The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal. 50(1). 308–326.
    22. Moller C. (2007). Process innovation laboratory: a new approach to business process innovation based on enterprise information systems. Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 1(1). 113–128.
    23. Sarma, K. M. (2008). Technology Transfer Mechanism for Climate Change. Retrieved Feb 2009. www.research.ucla.edu/oipa. 1-3.
    24. Song M, Bij HVD, Weggeman M. (2005). Determinants of the level of knowledge application: a knowledge based and information-processing perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 22(1). 430–444.
    25. Skovvang, K., (2005). Enabling intrapreneurship: the case of a knowledge-intensive industrial company. European Journal of Innovation Management. 8 (3). 305-322.
    26. Scott, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2003). Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue on Technology Entrepreneurship. Journal of Research Policy. 32(2).181–184.
    27. Smith, R. and Sharif, N. (2007). Understanding and acquiring technology assets for global competition. Technovation, 27(1).643-649.
    28. Slater, S. and Mohr, J. (2006). Successful Development and Commercialization of Technological Innovation: Insights Based on Strategy Type. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23(1). 26–33.
    29. Teng B. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: a resource-based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies 44. 119–142.
    30. Tornatzky, L. Fleischer, M. and Gray, D. (2002). Knowledge and Technology transfer in cooperative research settings. Retrieved Feb 2009. www.invent.ucsd.edu. 3-4.
    31. UNFCCC. (2008).Technology Transfer in The International Climate Negotiations. Green/EFA Workshop on Intellectual Property Right and Green Energy Technologies European Parliament, 17 September 2008. 1-2.
    32. Wu, W. (2010). Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities. Journal of technology transfer. 35(1). 203–224.
    33. Yang, P. Y and Chang, Y. Ch., (2010). Academic research commercialization and knowledge production and diffusion: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial commitment. Journal of Scientometrics. 83(1). 403–421.
    34. Yencken, J., Gillin M., (2002). Public Research Agencies as Sources for Innovations and the Entrepreneurial Absorptive Capacity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Babson Kauffman. Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boulder Colorado, June 2002. Babson College. 4-7.
    35. Yong-Hui, Li. Jing-Wen, H. Ming-Tien, T., (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management. 21(1). 32-42.
    36. Yuan, L. Xunfeng, L. Longwei, W. Mingfang, L; and Hai, G. (2009). How Entrepreneurial Orientation Moderates the Effects of Knowledge Management on Innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science Journal. 26(1). 645-660.
    37. Zahra, S.A. and Nielsen, A.P. (2002). Sources of Capabilities, Integration, and Technology Commercialization. Strategic Management Journal 23(5). 377–398.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار